2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object exploration in extremely preterm infants between 6 and 9 months and relation to cognitive and language development at 24 months

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has shown that infant object manipulation skills are developmentally linked to changes in visual object recognition (Soska et al, 2010), that experimental conditions that foster different object manipulation experiences change shape perception and object categorization (Smith, 2005; see also James et al, 2014), and that poor object manipulation skills predict later deficits in language learning (Zuccarini et al, 2017). The present results make clear that the visual information presented by a single object to the viewer's sensors is highly variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research has shown that infant object manipulation skills are developmentally linked to changes in visual object recognition (Soska et al, 2010), that experimental conditions that foster different object manipulation experiences change shape perception and object categorization (Smith, 2005; see also James et al, 2014), and that poor object manipulation skills predict later deficits in language learning (Zuccarini et al, 2017). The present results make clear that the visual information presented by a single object to the viewer's sensors is highly variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The answer, we propose, is that an essential component of the data for visual learning about objects is this self-generated variability. Previous research has shown that infant object manipulation skills are developmentally linked to changes in visual object recognition (Soska et al, 2010), that experimental conditions that foster different object manipulation experiences change shape perception and object categorization (Smith, 2005; see also James et al, 2014), and that poor object manipulation skills predict later deficits in language learning (Zuccarini et al, 2017). Other studies have shown that developmental changes in visual object recognition are correlated with noun vocabulary size (Jones & Smith, 2005;Smith, 2003) and predict later changes in object name learning (Yee, Jones, & Smith, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In preterm infants, the risk for short‐term and long‐term morbidity is still substantial and adverse neurological outcome is a frequent complication . Studies showed that language development is often impaired or delayed in children born preterm . In order to prepare plans for a timed management of infants with language and literacy difficulties at a preschool age, it would be desirable to single out children at risk for literacy deficits as early as the neonatal period .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have captured more precise temporal information in the context of mother/parent–infant play (e.g., Courage et al, 2010 ; James et al, 2012 ; Zuccarini et al, 2017 ). However, no play-specific coding schemes that we are aware of measure play behavior between the parent and infant at a time resolution that is fine-grained enough (i.e., 10s of milliseconds) to be compatible with neural (e.g., EEG) analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these existing schemes are not designed to capture and analyse the temporal evolution of a range of behavioral states as a fluid continuum. For example, Zuccarini et al (2017) coded ‘motor object exploration’ in infant play, where the infant explored an object with their hands or mouth, and Koterba et al (2014) coded infant looking and mouthing during play with a rattle. While such schemes reflect our emphasis on the continuous fine-grained coding of play behavior, they do so by coding one or two specific actions and then analyzing how the duration or frequency of those actions vary between infants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%