2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may result in false conclusions when a genetic mosaic or a chimera is involved in a case. It is, therefore, recommended that an appropriate probabilistic analysis of the crime or paternity case, taking into account inconsistencies between STR profiles, should be used [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may result in false conclusions when a genetic mosaic or a chimera is involved in a case. It is, therefore, recommended that an appropriate probabilistic analysis of the crime or paternity case, taking into account inconsistencies between STR profiles, should be used [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evident by the publication of a new text devoted solely to the use of forensic BNs [1] and various articles considering an array of forensic problems [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. A recent advancement in BN design is the application of the object-oriented programming paradigm [25,26], resulting in hierarchical representations, particularly well-suited for forensic DNA casework [27,28]. We use this technology here, making use of the object-oriented modeling capabilities of the BN software program HUGIN.…”
Section: Bayesian Network In Forensicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A BN for this case was first presented in [17] and reimplemented using objectoriented techniques in [28] resulting in the object-oriented Bayesian network (OOBN) appearing in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Example One: a Simple Paternity Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations