2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-016-0910-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective color image quality assessment based on Sobel magnitude

Abstract: Image quality assessment algorithms aim to evaluate the perceptual quality of an image by assigning an evaluation score. By comparing the scores, the perceptual similarity or difference between two images can be assessed. In this paper, we present a new full-reference image quality metric method which was developed by combining Sobel magnitude and chrominance information in the YIQ color space. But differing from existing methods, our model incorporates color intensity adaptation to extract and enhance percept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjective IQA is measured by asking a number of expert observers to look at each distorted image and rate its quality to obtain the mean opinion score (MOS) or differential mean opinion score (DMOS). Although subjective IQA methods are the most natural, accurate and reliable way of measuring the image quality, they have several drawbacks, including inconvenience and computation time [6, 7], which make them impractical for real‐time use or for control of image quality in automated systems. However, subjective IQA methods are usually correlated and benchmarked against any new objective IQA method to reference its performance against human visual perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective IQA is measured by asking a number of expert observers to look at each distorted image and rate its quality to obtain the mean opinion score (MOS) or differential mean opinion score (DMOS). Although subjective IQA methods are the most natural, accurate and reliable way of measuring the image quality, they have several drawbacks, including inconvenience and computation time [6, 7], which make them impractical for real‐time use or for control of image quality in automated systems. However, subjective IQA methods are usually correlated and benchmarked against any new objective IQA method to reference its performance against human visual perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%