2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observability solutions for in-field functional test of processor-based systems: A survey and quantitative test case evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach mimics what has been done in the recent past for microcontrollers and SoCs (by adding embedded instruments to be used for design validation, silicon debug, and test) and was extended to PCBs, taking advantage of the existence of software accessible embedded instruments that can significantly improve the fault observability. We also investigated the usage of other instruments, corresponding for example to the debug infrastructure [DU16] and performance counters which are present in many microprocessors [PER16], to better support functional test. Finally, the BASTION partners successfully investigated new solutions to increase the effectiveness of functional test programs [PER16] and to automate the generation of functional programs for testing permanent faults in small-and medium-sized processors [RIE16].…”
Section: Instrument-assisted Testing For Nffmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach mimics what has been done in the recent past for microcontrollers and SoCs (by adding embedded instruments to be used for design validation, silicon debug, and test) and was extended to PCBs, taking advantage of the existence of software accessible embedded instruments that can significantly improve the fault observability. We also investigated the usage of other instruments, corresponding for example to the debug infrastructure [DU16] and performance counters which are present in many microprocessors [PER16], to better support functional test. Finally, the BASTION partners successfully investigated new solutions to increase the effectiveness of functional test programs [PER16] and to automate the generation of functional programs for testing permanent faults in small-and medium-sized processors [RIE16].…”
Section: Instrument-assisted Testing For Nffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also investigated the usage of other instruments, corresponding for example to the debug infrastructure [DU16] and performance counters which are present in many microprocessors [PER16], to better support functional test. Finally, the BASTION partners successfully investigated new solutions to increase the effectiveness of functional test programs [PER16] and to automate the generation of functional programs for testing permanent faults in small-and medium-sized processors [RIE16].…”
Section: Instrument-assisted Testing For Nffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, developing STLs from scratch is not a trivial task, more so when targeting delay faults on complex devices. For test programs to achieve high fault coverage figures, they must be able to excite as many faults as possible from the whole DUT and make their effects observable at primary outputs (POs) by using instructions from the system's instruction set architecture, only [20]. Achieving this requires a nonnegligible amount of manual effort by the test engineer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, developing STLs from scratch is not a trivial task and requires a non-negligible amount of manual effort, more so when targeting complex devices: test programs must be able to excite as many faults as possible and make their effects observable at primary outputs (POs) by using instructions from the system's instruction set, only [20]. Moreover, understanding why certain faults are not detected is not always easy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%