As a shock travels through the interface between substances of different densities, existing perturbations can grow via the Richtmyer-Meshkov (RM) instability. The study of the RM instability in a convergent geometry leads to a better understanding of implosions applicable to inertial confinement fusion and various astrophysical events, such as core-collapse supernovae. We present results of laser-driven double-cylinder implosions performed at the Omega laser facility with an emphasis on sending a second shock through an already shocked RM unstable interface. The uniform reshock of a cylindrical interface is achieved by inserting a second cylinder inside the first that reflects the inwardly traveling shock and causes it to interact a second time with the unstable interface. We present an analysis of the instability growth as a function of shock strength and zero-order perturbation behavior during reshock.
Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Reshock and Astrophysical ProcessesThe Richtmyer-Meshkov instability (RMI) drives the growth of perturbations at the interface between different substances when a shock travels through it, regardless of whether the shock is traveling from a heavier to a lighter medium or vice versa. It promotes turbulence and mixing of the materials at either side of this interface. The RMI has relevance for a broad range of topics, including many astrophysical processes, such as RMI-induced mixing during the explosion phase of core-collapse (Type II) SNe, shock waves generated by SNe interacting with compressed ISM or denser molecular clouds, vortex formation in ISM (which may affect evolution scenarios of stars and structure formation in nebulae), morphology of SNe remnants (e.g. Cygnus Loop), and shock-clump interaction (Takabe, 2001). Any of these processes could experience reshock as well. Reshock occurs when a second shock travels through an already shocked interface.We study RMI reshock in cylindrical geometry, which includes convergent effects such as those seen in many astrophysical systems, but is still 2D and therefore simpler to diagnose, model, and interpret than fully 3D spherical geometry. This