1990
DOI: 10.1063/1.345734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of a new Al(111)/Si(111) orientational epitaxy

Abstract: A new Al(111)/Si(111) orientational epitaxy using x-ray pole figure analysis is reported. The new structure has a 19° rotation with respect to the parallel epitaxy. The results are explained using a geometrical lattice matching concept.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interfacial energy was reported to vary nonmonotonically with misorientation angle θ for Au, Cu, and Al films on (111) Si [20][21][22][23]. Those results confirm that there are special configurations of interfaces with relatively high planar coincident site densities.…”
Section: Single-phase Nanostructuressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The interfacial energy was reported to vary nonmonotonically with misorientation angle θ for Au, Cu, and Al films on (111) Si [20][21][22][23]. Those results confirm that there are special configurations of interfaces with relatively high planar coincident site densities.…”
Section: Single-phase Nanostructuressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A GSAM model was applied to the germanium/sapphire interface to evaluate the epitaxial relationship between the two materials. It has been shown that the GSAM model can predict and match well for many heterostructure interfaces. , As mentioned in the previous study, the model evaluates the superlattice formed by the two crystalline materials on their interfaces regarding the superlattice area and area mismatch. It searches for the minimum superlattice area and minimum area mismatch between the two materials using the geometry of each unit mesh at the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are Among the three relationships, ͑1͒ was most commonly observed due to it having the lowest strain energy. Based on the in-plane orientation determined by maximizing the number of coincidence sites at the interface between TiSi 2 and the silicon substrate, the areal mismatch ͑⌬A͒ is defined by ⌬A = A͓͑⌬a / a͒ + ͑⌬b / b͒ + ͑⌬␣ cot ␣͔͒, 40 where a and b are the edges of the superlattice, ␣ is the angle between the edges of the superlattice a and b, A is equal to ab sin ␣, and ⌬a, ⌬b, and ⌬␣ are the mismatch of a, b, and ␣, respectively. The areal mismatch between silicon and the C49 polymorph of TiSi 2 based on the above expression is 1.65, 5.69, and 3.12 Å 2 , for the orientation relationships ͑1͒-͑3͒, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%