2011
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/94/57004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of both classical and quantum magnetoresistance in bilayer graphene

Abstract: Magnetoresistance (MR) in bilayer graphene was experimentally investigated by varying magnetic-field strength. A transition from classical MR (superlinear dependence (B 4/3 )) to quantum MR (Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations) was observed at a magnetic field of about 10 T. The superlinear MR dependence is described using a classical route by considering the large inhomogenous mobility spatial distribution of charge carriers. Our experimental results may help to provide a clear physical picture of the magneto-tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned reduction in mobility (scattering time) to 63% of the original value leads to a decrease in the magnitude of the magnetoresistance by a factor of 0.63 2 = 0.4, which typically scales as MR ∼ (ω c τ ) α where ω c is the cyclotron frequency, τ is the scattering time [21,22] and α is approximately 2, in qualitative agreement with the curves shown in figure 3(d). At the same time, an increase in n h manifests itself in metallic-like temperature dependence of R graphene in figure 3(b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The aforementioned reduction in mobility (scattering time) to 63% of the original value leads to a decrease in the magnitude of the magnetoresistance by a factor of 0.63 2 = 0.4, which typically scales as MR ∼ (ω c τ ) α where ω c is the cyclotron frequency, τ is the scattering time [21,22] and α is approximately 2, in qualitative agreement with the curves shown in figure 3(d). At the same time, an increase in n h manifests itself in metallic-like temperature dependence of R graphene in figure 3(b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Figure 1(a) shows the MR defined as ½RðBÞ À RðB ¼ 0Þ =RðB ¼ 0Þ Â 100% at T ¼ 300 K. As can be seen, the MR is positive and exhibits a quadratic B dependence near B ¼ 0 T. This parabolic MR can be ascribed to the Lorentz deflection of carriers, which has been observed in Bi 2 Te 3 , 18 Bi 2 Se 3 , 19 and bilayer graphene. 20 With increasing B, the quadratic B dependence is transformed into a linear dependence at high field with no sign of saturation, which indicates that a linear MR is observed in our sample. Since the Lorentz deflection-induced quadratic B dependence saturates at high magnetic field, 13 the observed linear MR cannot be attributed to the Lorentz deflection of carriers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…To date, two models have been proposed to explain LMR: the classical model (Parish and Littlewood, PL) [18,19] and the quantum model (Abrikosov) [20,21]. Within the classical model, it is argued that the magnetotransport properties of the material and the LMR are governed by spatial mobility fluctuations rather than the mobility itself [3,19,22,23]. Two cases were studied numerically based on the properties of the mobility, and LMR was observed in both cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%