1990
DOI: 10.1109/68.50892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of equivalent Rayleigh scattering mirrors in lightwave systems with optical amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the response obtained when the Rayleigh scattering lasing is generated by the distributed mirror: (a) double Rayleigh scattering (DRS) lasing when is observed in Raman copropagating and (b) Rayleigh scattering (RS) lasing when is observed in Raman counterpropagating. The lasing is because of the distributed mirror created inside the DCF and corresponds to a similar effect such as the reflections of two discrete mirrors with effective reflectance proportional to the ratio of the total backscattered to the incident power [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the response obtained when the Rayleigh scattering lasing is generated by the distributed mirror: (a) double Rayleigh scattering (DRS) lasing when is observed in Raman copropagating and (b) Rayleigh scattering (RS) lasing when is observed in Raman counterpropagating. The lasing is because of the distributed mirror created inside the DCF and corresponds to a similar effect such as the reflections of two discrete mirrors with effective reflectance proportional to the ratio of the total backscattered to the incident power [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a) and G1G2R1R2 in Fig. 3(b), where G, G1 and G2 were the bidirectional gain, the unidirectional gain of downstream signal and upstream signal in the optical amplifiers, and R1 and R2 were the reflectance coefficients at both sides of bidirectional amplifiers, respectively [5,8]. In case of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because various optical amplifiers, such as erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) and Raman amplifier, could provide an extended reach and/or a high split-ratio for the cost-effective implementation of PONs. However, it has been well known that the performance of bidirectional transmission systems over a single fiber could be degraded by the in-band crosstalk [5]. In principle, the in-band crosstalk components would be generated by a double Rayleigh backscattering (DRB) and discrete reflection points within a transmission fiber, and amplified with the gain of bidirectional optical amplifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because various optical amplifiers, such as erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) and Raman amplifier, could provide a long reach and/or a high split-ratio for the cost-effective implementation of passive optical networks (PONs). However, in the amplified PON architectures, the system's performance could be limited by the in-band crosstalk generated with a double Rayleigh backscattering (DRB) within a transmission fiber, especially when the downstream and upstream signals would transmit simultaneously through a single fiber [5]. Recently, it has been reported that the broadband light source (BLS) based optical sources for WDM-PON architectures, such as a spectrum-sliced source, a wavelength-locked Fabry-Perot laser diode (FP-LD) and a reflective SOA (RSOA), were more tolerant to the in-band crosstalk than a DFB-LD source [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a) and (b). In our measurements, the crosstalk-to-signal ratio could be estimated with G 2 R 1 R 2 or G 1 G 2 R 1 R 2 , where G, G 1 and G 2 were the bidirectional and unidirectional gain of optical amplifiers, and R 1 and R 2 were the reflectance coefficients at both sides of bidirectional amplifiers, respectively [5,7]. For all measurements with an amplified WDM-PON shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%