1996
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)01343-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of true c(8 × 2) symmetry in scanning tunnelling microscopy images of the clean InSb(001) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
12
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Between these bright rows are two more rows of features ͑marked B͒ that are somewhat less intense and evenly distributed along the ͓110͔ direction. This image, recorded with a bias voltage of Ϫ2.0 V and a tunnel current of 1.67 nA, differs from the previously published work of Schweitzer et al, 3 but is similar to the image produced by Varekamp et al 5 Marked on Fig. 1 are a series of (4ϫ2) blocks which have been arranged to form the overall c(8ϫ2) unit mesh seen in LEED.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Between these bright rows are two more rows of features ͑marked B͒ that are somewhat less intense and evenly distributed along the ͓110͔ direction. This image, recorded with a bias voltage of Ϫ2.0 V and a tunnel current of 1.67 nA, differs from the previously published work of Schweitzer et al, 3 but is similar to the image produced by Varekamp et al 5 Marked on Fig. 1 are a series of (4ϫ2) blocks which have been arranged to form the overall c(8ϫ2) unit mesh seen in LEED.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…3 They also observed a (4ϫ2) unit mesh in a relatively low quality empty states image, but there was insufficient data from which to derive any detailed structural information. 5 The observation of the true c(8ϫ2) unit mesh does, however, indicate that the double rows of bright spots cannot be due to second layer Sb atoms. Although noting this fact, Varekamp et al were unable to suggest an alternative structural model for the surface that agreed with their STM images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9,10 In addition, the cost of InSb substrates is far less than that of CdZnTe substrates. A variety of cleaning procedures including thermal desorption in the absence and in the presence of Sb overpressures, [11][12][13][14][15] atomic and molecular hydrogen treatments, [14][15][16][17] ion bombardment and annealing, 11,[18][19][20] and wet etches [21][22][23][24][25] have been reported to prepare InSb (111), (100), and (110) orientations. These studies address the problems associated with in vacuo thermal cleaning since the InSb oxide desorption temperature is close to the melting point of InSb ($527°C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%