2013
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-13-00091.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation Quality Control with a Robust Ensemble Kalman Filter

Abstract: Current ensemble-based Kalman filter (EnKF) algorithms are not robust to gross observation errors caused by technical or human errors during the data collection process. In this paper, the authors consider two types of gross observational errors, additive statistical outliers and innovation outliers, and introduce a method to make EnKF robust to gross observation errors. Using both a one-dimensional linear system of dynamics and a 40-variable Lorenz model, the performance of the proposed robust ensemble Kalman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the rainfall data with unknown θ, we used state augmentation. For the heavy-tailed data, we also implemented the robust Huber-EnKF proposed in Roh et al (2013). The Huber-EnKF requires a cutoff or clipping value for each observation location, which we selected by sampling 1000 times from the true forecast distribution based on an update consisting of a single observation at the respective location.…”
Section: Simulation Study For Non-gaussian Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the rainfall data with unknown θ, we used state augmentation. For the heavy-tailed data, we also implemented the robust Huber-EnKF proposed in Roh et al (2013). The Huber-EnKF requires a cutoff or clipping value for each observation location, which we selected by sampling 1000 times from the true forecast distribution based on an update consisting of a single observation at the respective location.…”
Section: Simulation Study For Non-gaussian Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2: Simulation results for non-Gaussian observations: heavy-tailed data (Example 1) and rainfall data (Example 2). MSPE = mean squared prediction error; CRPS = continuous ranked probability score; exact = posterior distribution obtained using MCMC; PF = SIR particle filter; Huber = robust Huber-EnKF fromRoh et al (2013) Mean squared prediction error (MSPE) versus time for GEnKF and particle filter (PF) updates in the simulated rain example for known κ = 3. Note that time on the x-axis is on a log scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reflects an increased uncertainty in the production rates resulting from less confidence in the accuracy of the geophysical data. Data quality is an important aspect for reservoir interpretation and reservoir history matching purposes, as large errors in the data may lead to overshooting or undershooting in the Kalman filtering update step (Roh et al 2013;Trani, Arts, and Leeuwenburgh 2012;Chen and Oliver 2010;Anderson 2009). This is exemplified in the fact that, for large levels of noise in the data, it becomes rather challenging to distinguish the individual phase components in the reservoir from the gravity and InSAR data.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Observation Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These robust statistical methodologies are essential because the data being modelled in fisheries science and management may be subject to large measurement error and the state and observation processes are only approximations with the consequence that there may well be outlying observations or deviating substructures. Much of the recent research on robustness for SSMs (Roh et al, ; Calvet, Czellar, & Ronchetti, ) has focussed on building in robustness against errors in the observation process without much attention to robust estimation of the parameters. The parameters are important here because the interest is in estimates of the proportion mature for a specific year and cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%