2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005gl024583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational evidence for exponential tornado intensity distributions over specific kinetic energy

Abstract: [1] Observational evidence supports the recent analytical prediction that tornado intensities are exponentially distributed over peak wind speed squared (v 2 ), or equivalently, Rayleigh-distributed over v. For large USA data samples, exponential tails are found in the tornado intensity distributions over v 2 from about F2 intensity on. Similar results follow for smaller worldwide data samples. For the 1990s data from the USA and Oklahoma, deviations from the Rayleigh distribution for weak tornadoes can be exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…substituting v ≡ x-a, and v 0 ≡ b, Dotzek et al (2005) were able to corroborate and generalize results by Kurgansky (2000) who had analytically predicted a Rayleigh distribution for tornado intensity distributions over wind speed. Comparing the evolution of parameter c from general Weibull distribution fits worldwide, Dotzek et al (2005) showed that for increasing quality and sample size of tornado intensity datasets, a trend towards c = 2 can indeed be concluded.…”
Section: Underlying Problems and Approachessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…substituting v ≡ x-a, and v 0 ≡ b, Dotzek et al (2005) were able to corroborate and generalize results by Kurgansky (2000) who had analytically predicted a Rayleigh distribution for tornado intensity distributions over wind speed. Comparing the evolution of parameter c from general Weibull distribution fits worldwide, Dotzek et al (2005) showed that for increasing quality and sample size of tornado intensity datasets, a trend towards c = 2 can indeed be concluded.…”
Section: Underlying Problems and Approachessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Brooks and Doswell (2001b) noted that the distribution of tornadoes by intensity appeared similar in many countries, implying that there might be an underlying physical process (or set of processes) that leads to the intensity of a tornado. Since that time, Dotzek et al (2003Dotzek et al ( , 2005 and Feuerstein et al (2005) have worked to put that speculation on a firmer statistical footing. Dotzek et al (2003) and Feuerstein et al (2005) showed that Weibull distributions could be fit to the data from a variety of countries worldwide and applied a two-parameter leastsquare fit to observed worldwide tornado intensity distributions both in F-scale and wind speed v. With x denoting either of these, the Weibull distribution is given in three-parameter form for probability density p(x):…”
Section: Underlying Problems and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make such a comparison, hDi-value in equation (7) has been calculated from the observational data; it provides an example of the moment estimation technique [cf. Dotzek et al, 2005]. A rough a posteriori L 0 -estimate for typical desert conditions in Arizona and southern California [Kurgansky, 2006] confirmed plausibility of the conjecture (B).…”
Section: Dust Devil Diameter Statistical Distributionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A rough a posteriori L 0 -estimate for typical desert conditions in Arizona and southern California [Kurgansky, 2006] confirmed plausibility of the conjecture (B). To independently demonstrate a good match of equation (7) and Sinclair's [1966] data (for the Tucson Basin and the Avra Valley in Arizona) we fit these data by a two-parameter Weibull distribution Dotzek et al, 2005], written in terms of the probability P for the vortex diameter to exceed a given D-value. Two parameters x and D 0 are specified from the best fit to observations; equation (7) corresponds to x = 1.…”
Section: Dust Devil Diameter Statistical Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these changes were intentional, while others were not. The implications for continued applicability of comparisons of ratings across time and space that we have been involved in the past are troubling (e.g., Brooks and Doswell, 2001;Dotzek et al, 2003Dotzek et al, , 2005Feuerstein et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%