2005
DOI: 10.1175/waf-830.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of a Severe, Left-Moving Supercell on 4 May 2003

Abstract: A case study of a left-moving supercell with a rapid motion is presented to (i) elucidate differences in anvil orientations between left-and right-moving supercells and (ii) highlight the interaction of the left mover with a tornadic right mover. It is shown how anvil orientations, as viewed from satellite, may be used to assist in the identification of thunderstorms with differing motions and how this applies to splitting supercells. Additionally, the movement of the left mover into the forward flank of the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the importance of storm mergers in modulating convective evolution, this information was noted for both the long-and short-lived supercell events. These mergers can be either destructive or reinforcing (e.g., Lindsey and Bunkers 2005). To eliminate the smallest "feeder" cells (Browning 1977) from consideration, a merger between a supercell and another storm (i.e., the blending of the storm cores) was only documented if the reflectivity of the second storm was Ͼ35 dBZ.…”
Section: Properties Recorded For the Supercell Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the importance of storm mergers in modulating convective evolution, this information was noted for both the long-and short-lived supercell events. These mergers can be either destructive or reinforcing (e.g., Lindsey and Bunkers 2005). To eliminate the smallest "feeder" cells (Browning 1977) from consideration, a merger between a supercell and another storm (i.e., the blending of the storm cores) was only documented if the reflectivity of the second storm was Ͼ35 dBZ.…”
Section: Properties Recorded For the Supercell Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When, in the Northern Hemisphere, the wind shear vector rotates clockwise with height, the right-moving storm is favored, and if the wind shear vector rotates counter clockwise, the left-moving storm is favored. In the typical supercells, developing in the Northern Hemisphere, which usually are right-moving, the rotation is mesocyclonic, while in the rare left-moving supercells the rotation is mesoanticyclonic (e.g., House et al, 1993;Nielsen-Gammon and Read, 1995;Lindsey and Bunkers, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have shown that continuous mergers play a crucial role in the process in which storm cells strengthen to form a supercell storm and that cell mergers and interactions may prompt tornadogenesis [15][16][17][18]. Some investigations also show that storm mergers may disrupt an ongoing tornado [13], or appear to slow or cease the tornado's production [19]. Furthermore, a number of observational studies have investigated the relationship between storm mergers and the formation, development, and dissipation of a tornado [11,13,[18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigations also show that storm mergers may disrupt an ongoing tornado [13], or appear to slow or cease the tornado's production [19]. Furthermore, a number of observational studies have investigated the relationship between storm mergers and the formation, development, and dissipation of a tornado [11,13,[18][19][20]. Based on radar observations from non-tornadic storms in Illinois, Westcott and Kennedy (1989) described two storm merger types [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%