Solar Eruptions and Energetic Particles 2006
DOI: 10.1029/165gm26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of Energetic Storm Particles: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ESP events are typically classified into the following types depending on their temporal profile: spike, rise, step, flat and complex (Lario et al., 2003 ; Tsurutani & Lin, 1985 ). There is no simple relationship between the presence/absence and type of ESP events and shock parameters, such as speed, Mach number, or shock normal angle (Cohen, 2006 ). To understand how the acceleration of particles varies along the shock front, ESP measurements made by Wind and ACE of the same events were compared, when Wind was in prograde or petal orbits.…”
Section: Selected Science Results From Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESP events are typically classified into the following types depending on their temporal profile: spike, rise, step, flat and complex (Lario et al., 2003 ; Tsurutani & Lin, 1985 ). There is no simple relationship between the presence/absence and type of ESP events and shock parameters, such as speed, Mach number, or shock normal angle (Cohen, 2006 ). To understand how the acceleration of particles varies along the shock front, ESP measurements made by Wind and ACE of the same events were compared, when Wind was in prograde or petal orbits.…”
Section: Selected Science Results From Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICME associated with this June event did not directly impact Earth; see, for example, the Richardson and Cane ICME list (Richardson & Cane, 2010) or the Kasper and Stevens shock list. Nevertheless, Figure 1c shows that Wind clearly observed a broad signature of "energetic storm particles" (SEPs accelerated locally by a passing ICME; see Cohen, 2006) beginning near 12:00 on 23 June and lasting ∼24 hr, with all but the highest SST energy channel displaying an enhanced differential energy flux. Panels 1d and 1f illustrate that a nearly identical enhancement was observed by the ARTEMIS SSTs at energies 100 keV ≲ E ≲ 1 MeV during this time.…”
Section: Observations Of Seps Within the Tailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identified in-situ arrivals of CME2 and CME8 (orange lines) are followed by enhanced flux of protons with energy below 10 MeV, especially upon CME8's arrival which corresponds to a much stronger in-situ shock (Li et al, 2022). These so-called energetic storm particles (ESPs) are believed to be accelerated by interplanetary shocks as they propagate outward (C. M. Cohen, 2006).…”
Section: Particle Measurements At Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%