Observations of floating anthropogenic litter in the Barents Sea and Fram Strait, Arctic

Abstract

Although recent reports indicate that anthropogenic waste has made it to the remotest parts of our oceans, there is still only limited information about its spread, especially in polar seas. Here, we present litter densities recorded during ship-and helicopter-based observer surveys in the Barents Sea and Fram Strait (Arctic). Thirty-one items were recorded in total, 23 from helicopter and eight from research vessel transects. Litter quantities ranged between 0 and 0.216 items km -1 with a mean of 0.001 (±SEM 0.005) items km -1 . All of the floating objects observed were plastic items. Litter densities were slightly higher in the Fram Strait (0.006 items km -1 ) compared with the Barents Sea (0.004 items km -1 ). More litter was recorded during helicopter-based surveys than during ship-based surveys (0.006 and 0.004 items km -1 , respectively). When comparing with the few available data with the same unit (items km -1 transect), the densities found herein are slightly higher than those from Antarctica but substantially lower than those from temperate waters. However, since anthropogenic activities in the Fram Strait are expanding because of sea ice shrinkage, and since currents from the North Atlantic carry a continuous supply of litter to the north, this problem is likely to worsen in years to come unless serious mitigating actions are taken to reduce the amounts of litter entering the oceans.

A State-of-the-Art Compact Surface Drifter Reveals Pathways of Floating Marine Litter in the German Bight

“…Maximenko et al (2012) used a transition matrix, derived from a global dataset of drifter trajectories, to study the distribution of marine litter and identified five major oceanic accumulation zones which were confirmed by in situ observations (Ryan, 2014;Lebreton et al, 2018). van Sebille et al (2012) implemented a more representative source function of litter and found another garbage patch in the Barents Sea which was also confirmed by recent in situ observations (Bergmann et al, 2016). Other authors have combined trajectories of surface drifters and particle tracking methods to investigate the distribution of FML in the Mediterranean Sea (Carlson et al, 2017b;Politikos et al, 2017;Zambianchi et al, 2017).…”

Long-term aquaria study suggests species-specific responses of two cold-water corals to macro-and microplastics exposure

“…Anthropogenic activities have a strong negative impact on marine life as extensively documented for metal pollution (Islam and Tanaka, 2004), overfishing (Coll et al, 2008), trawling (Jones, 1992) or ocean acidification (Orr et al, 2005). Plastic pollutants have now been observed in all marine ecosystems (Bergmann et al, 2016;Herrera et al, 2019), including the deep-sea (Woodall et al, 2014). Macroplastics are large debris (> 5 mm of diameter) known to be harmful for marine life (Besseling et al, 2014;Derraik, 2002;Tanaka et al, 2013) and represent the "visible" part of the problem.…”

Using Numerical Model Simulations to Improve the Understanding of Micro-plastic Distribution and Pathways in the Marine Environment

“…Its small size, however, makes it difficult to observe remotely, thus limiting an accurate assessment of total amounts. Nevertheless, plastic debris can be observed in seas around the world, from concentrations exceeding 600,000 pieces per km 2 (Law et al, 2010) in the accumulation zones to more remote regions such as the waters of the Arctic (Bergmann et al, 2016) and the Antarctic (Barnes et al, 2010) where far fewer plastic pieces are observed. It has become clear that humanity's discarded litter is spreading throughout our seas and oceans (e.g., Pham et al, 2014;Jambeck et al, 2015;GESAMP, 2016).…”