“…It is worth noting that in computing the true headings of the neonates, wave, wind, and inertial influences could differentially impact the neonates and the drifters. However, inertial influences are unlikely to be important, as the mean size of the neonates gives them an effective radius that minimizes inertial effects to less than 5 • of the deflection angle (Beron-Vera et al, 2015;Brooks et al, 2019) and at the modest wind speeds measured (1-5 m s −1 ), assuming a 0.27% windage effect calculated from a similar drifter (Meyerjürgens et al, 2019), the error associated with the windage would be (0.0027-0.0135 m s −1 ), which is orders of magnitude smaller than the neonate swimming speeds. Wave influences, or Stokes drift, would be aligned onshore in these nearshore waters and perpendicular to the isobaths and would potentially hinder the neonate's offshore trajectory and slow their swimming speed.…”