1973
DOI: 10.1159/000465635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on a New Example of the A(m) Phenotype which Demonstrates Reduced A Secretion

Abstract: A new example of the A(m) phenotype is described. The red cells have a very weak A status, best demonstrated by ‘immune’ anti-A sera using enzyme techniques. The serum contains normal anti-B but no anti-A or A substance. The saliva contains A, H and Le^a substances, but the A:H substance ratio was lower than normal, indicating that the y y genes reduce the formation of secreted A as well as that of cellular A substance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our opinion, even in absence of more genetic data, the immuno logical criteria published by Gundolf and Andersen [9] about their subject IM (small amount of B substance secreted in the saliva and absence of demon strable anti-B in the eluates of IM RBC incubated with anti-B sera) do agree with the description of the first case of By phenotype. On the contrary, the phenotypes described by Liotta et al [ 17] and Salmon et al [25] are respectively known as Bm and B0 and should correspond to phenotypes named 'Bm' the transmission of which as an ABO allele has been demonstrated in the family reported by Ikemoto et al [14], Darnborough et al [4] have suggested that in Ay subjects, only the for mation of glycolipid A substance is blocked. However, the results of en zyme conversion of the Ay RBC by various glycosyltransferases seem to show that the Ay red cell membrane behave normally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our opinion, even in absence of more genetic data, the immuno logical criteria published by Gundolf and Andersen [9] about their subject IM (small amount of B substance secreted in the saliva and absence of demon strable anti-B in the eluates of IM RBC incubated with anti-B sera) do agree with the description of the first case of By phenotype. On the contrary, the phenotypes described by Liotta et al [ 17] and Salmon et al [25] are respectively known as Bm and B0 and should correspond to phenotypes named 'Bm' the transmission of which as an ABO allele has been demonstrated in the family reported by Ikemoto et al [14], Darnborough et al [4] have suggested that in Ay subjects, only the for mation of glycolipid A substance is blocked. However, the results of en zyme conversion of the Ay RBC by various glycosyltransferases seem to show that the Ay red cell membrane behave normally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DARNBOROUGH et al [4] have suggested that in Ay subjects, only the formation of glycolipid A substance is blocked. However, the results of enzyme conversion of the A, RBC by various glycosyltransferases seem to show that the A, red cell membrane behave normally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the genetic level, two groups of healthy Am individuals can be distinguished : (1) The first group of individuals belong to the phenotype first described by WEINER et al [37], then by DODD and GILBEY [5] and more recently by DARNBOROUCH et al [4]. This phenotype results from the action of a recessive y A gene independent of the ABO locus, present in double dose, which hinders the erythrocyte expression of the A antigen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the two A,B blood samples shown in table I, one of them, 'A2B', is an example of a fairly common type that must be avoided for assessing anti-A potency especially by avidity tests, as these are examples of suppressed A,B bloods [17] that have a far stronger A status than true A,B bloods. Elution at 56 O C [9] after absorption of the 18-fold anti-A concentrate at 4 O C using A,, A,, A,, A,, A, and control 0 cells, revealed a marked difference from studies with human serum anti-A reagents [7,9].…”
Section: Potency and A Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%