Observations on Asexual and Sexual Reproductive Structures of the Choanephoraceae

Poitras, Adrian W.

doi:10.1080/00275514.1955.12024487

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The zygosporangium of members of the Choanephoraceae (Hesseltine 1953, Kirk 1977, Poitras 1955 and may be nearly equal in diameter to the hypha in which they are formed, or greatly enlarged.…”

Section: Gemmae In Thementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Whole Fungus: The Sexual-Asexual Synthesis

K.¹,

Kendrick²

1980

Mycologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

have often remained relatively obscure because they have simply been dismissed as asexual spores.But although mitotically formed, they are not 'a-sexual' since not only can they fuse with monokaryotic hyphae of their own taxon, but some also produce growth substance(s)which attract the hyphae of their own or closely related taxa. Thus a spermatium can be "recognized' by the hyphal tips of a growing colony of the same or similar species: Kemp (pers. comm.) has claimed that the "homing response'', as he calls it, is not species-specific, and can occur between a hypha and an arthroconidium of closely related species. This homing reaction can frequently be observed within 1-2 hours.Homing is a very valuable tool for the taxonomic agaricologist, because the response is often found in closely related species, and although a lethal reaction may follow, at least by this means one can ascertain the relative closeness of two taxa.Ecologically, the arthroconidia probably act as 'sterilizing' agents in any microhabitat, suppressing the growth and establishment of any late-comers, or restricting them to other ecological niches.Undoubtedly there is a stimulatory series in the genus Coprinus (Coprinaceae), for although there are two basic types of arthroconidium, 'wet' and 'dry', the former are frequently poor at germinating although strong attractors, whilst the latter germinate freely but are not usually good at causing the 'homing' effect. Dry and wet conidia are uncommonly found together in a single species.A range of conidiophores is produced within a single genus such as Coprinus (Fig. 19.1A §& H), and, by screening as many species as possible, work in Edinburgh has shown that the kind of branching of the conidiophore often reflects the infra-generic grouping. Thus Kemp (pers. comm.) has shown that, in the two species of Subsect. Comqtt he studied, spherical arthroconidia are formed on candelabra-like conidiophores, but those in Subsect. Lanatult form arthroconidia which coalesce into small 'wet' heads held above the vegetative mycelium.In the Sect. Hemerobit (s.g. Pseudocoprinus Kithner emend. Orton § Watling, ined,) the variation in conidiophore morphology is much greater, in my opinion reflecting the greater diversity of the genus, a diversity which is also seen in the range of mating patterns exhibited, i.e., homothallic, 2-spored or 4-spored, bipolar or tetrapolar, and vegetative hyphae with or without clamp-connections. In 2-spored C. sassit M. Lge & A.H. Smith, and 4-spored C. hiascens (Fr.) Quél., short conidiophores are formed, reduced still further in C. congregatus (Bull. ex St. Amans) Fr., where the arthroconidia are formed in tufts more or less directly on the vegetative hyphae. Species forming wet or dry arthroconidia are found in the Setulosi, and in some species conidiophores are absent altogether. C. pellucidus Karst. and C. steZlatus Buller are both homothallic, lack clamp-connections and form dry conidia; in contrast, wet conidia are formed in C. congregatus. The wet arthroconidia apparently possess a s...

show abstract

Section: Gemmae In Thementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Choanephoraceae probably should be limited in scope to a single genus, Choanephora Currey , Benjamin 1959, Poitras 1955, Sinha 1940) although there still is much sentiment in favor of retaining Blakeslea Thaxter as distinct from the former (Hesseltine §& C.R. Benjamin 1957, Hesseltine & Ellis 1973, Naumov 1935, Zycha et al 1969.…”

Section: Gemmae In Thementioning

confidence: 99%