2006
DOI: 10.1175/jas3745.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed Boundary Layer Wind Structure and Balance in the Hurricane Core. Part I: Hurricane Georges

Abstract: The GPS dropsonde allows observations at unprecedentedly high horizontal and vertical resolution, and of very high accuracy, within the tropical cyclone boundary layer. These data are used to document the boundary layer wind field of the core of Hurricane Georges (1998) when it was close to its maximum intensity. The spatial variability of the boundary layer wind structure is found to agree very well with the theoretical predictions in the works of Kepert and Wang. In particular, the ratio of the near-surface … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
92
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
22
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their arguments were strongly influenced by the slab-model results of , so the fact that slab models overestimate the depth-mean inflow and the strength of the supergradient flow may be cause to doubt their reasoning. Indeed, while emphasize the ubiquity of supergradient flow in the slab model, analysis of observations shows that not all storms contain strongly supergradient flow in the boundary layer, consistent with simulation of these storms by the height-resolving model (Kepert, 2006a;Schwendike and Kepert, 2008). Further, do not give the mechanism by which the boundary-layer dynamics and supergradient flow lead to an adjustment in the cyclone's mass field, necessary for intensification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Their arguments were strongly influenced by the slab-model results of , so the fact that slab models overestimate the depth-mean inflow and the strength of the supergradient flow may be cause to doubt their reasoning. Indeed, while emphasize the ubiquity of supergradient flow in the slab model, analysis of observations shows that not all storms contain strongly supergradient flow in the boundary layer, consistent with simulation of these storms by the height-resolving model (Kepert, 2006a;Schwendike and Kepert, 2008). Further, do not give the mechanism by which the boundary-layer dynamics and supergradient flow lead to an adjustment in the cyclone's mass field, necessary for intensification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The boundary layer spin-up mechanism explains why the maximum azimuthally-averaged tangential wind speeds are located near the top of the boundary layer in the model calculations of Smith et al (2009) and others (e.g. Braun and Tao 2000, Zhang et al 2001, and in observations (Kepert 2006a, b, Montgomery et al 2006, Bell and Montgomery 2008, Schwendike and Kepert 2008, Sanger et al 2014, Zhang et al 2011a). …”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…most theoretical models of hurricanes (e.g., Kepert 2001;Smith et al 2008;Bryan and Rotunno 2009b;Smith and Thomsen 2010), we believe it worthwhile to estimate the vertical diffusivity here using the data in Hurricanes Hugo and Allen. Typically, the vertical eddy diffusivity is defined as…”
Section: Data and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%