2015
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201500082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observing Atoms at Work by Controlling Beam–Sample Interactions

Abstract: Functional behavior can be initiated and captured in series of images with previously unknown details using a successful effort to effectively control beam-sample interactions in high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The approach uses tunable electron dose rates that can be chosen to be as low as attoamperes per square-Ångstrom to delay sample degradation to an unexplored end. Dose rates can be systematically increased to stimulate and observe dynamic object responses. Observations can be made in r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike the abrupt onset of knock-on damage in bulk materials, this onset is continuous and occurs at much lower energies because of the distribution of reduced binding energies of atoms at surfaces, interfaces, or defects [24, 25]. In fact, surface effects entirely dominate if the sample dimensions shrink to the range of single-digit nanoparticles, where entire particles can become unstable in the electron beam [20, 26].
Fig.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike the abrupt onset of knock-on damage in bulk materials, this onset is continuous and occurs at much lower energies because of the distribution of reduced binding energies of atoms at surfaces, interfaces, or defects [24, 25]. In fact, surface effects entirely dominate if the sample dimensions shrink to the range of single-digit nanoparticles, where entire particles can become unstable in the electron beam [20, 26].
Fig.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, S/TEM electron probes also interact with the environment (gas or liquid) itself and care has to be taken to avoid uncontrolled changes of the in situ condition (local heating, ionization of gas, radiolysis damage to liquids, local chemistry/pH changes, etc.) [1,17,49,55,57,65,69,[75][76][77]143,164]. When using gaseous environments in MEMS cartridges lattice resolution in S/TEM have been reported [170], while, when using liquid environments, nanometer spatial resolution seems to be the current limit [57,69,164].…”
Section: Observe Structural Evolution Of Interfaces In Gaseous and LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these illumination conditions might be unsuitable for studying atomic arrangements at interfaces -with lower bond energies compared to regular atomic coordination. We need to pay attention to beam -sample -local environment interactions [17,37,39,55,64,76,77] to maintain the potential of comparing in situ S/TEM results with information achieved from other in situ experiments as well as data from ex situ or post mortem investigations. Structural reorganization caused by electron beam need to be avoided or at least be controlled and specified [65].…”
Section: Maintaining Inherent Atomic S/tem Resolution In In Situ Expementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the probing radiation still actively alters the genuine structure of surfaces, interfaces and small atom clusters because unavoidable beam-sample interactions remain relevant if binding energies are lowered compared to bulk values and the onset of atom displacements is soft without exhibiting a pronounced threshold. In atomic resolution images with single atom sensitivity such alterations are readily visible [5].As heterogeneous materials scale below 5-10 nm, interfaces and small atom clusters allow tailoring unprecedented materials properties and it becomes essential to explicitly address their sensitivity to any probing radiation. For a detection of single atoms in these circumstances, we recently introduced low dose-rate in-line holography [3 -5], which allows operating electron microscopes with dose rates that are comparable with best practices in biological applications while achieving single atom sensitivity by the acquisition of large image series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the probing radiation still actively alters the genuine structure of surfaces, interfaces and small atom clusters because unavoidable beam-sample interactions remain relevant if binding energies are lowered compared to bulk values and the onset of atom displacements is soft without exhibiting a pronounced threshold. In atomic resolution images with single atom sensitivity such alterations are readily visible [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%