1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43992-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstructing Malignant Lesions of the Colon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other techniques that could ascertain the presence of the malignant obstruction include contrast enema or gentle endoscopic evaluation. 26,27 Furthermore, CT scan can garner information regarding the possibility of insertion of an endoscopic stent. 10,11 The site and length of the primary lesion and the severity of obstruction are important considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques that could ascertain the presence of the malignant obstruction include contrast enema or gentle endoscopic evaluation. 26,27 Furthermore, CT scan can garner information regarding the possibility of insertion of an endoscopic stent. 10,11 The site and length of the primary lesion and the severity of obstruction are important considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient rapidly developed liver metastases after surgery, except for emergency surgery [25] and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy, factors consisting of BRAF V600E mutation and MSS status may also contribute to the aggressiveness. Fortunately, the patient achieved an exciting efficacy of CR when 8 cycles of capecitabine were completed and obtained long-term survival, which was encouraging, as few patients using capecitabine alone had obtained such great efficacy, long-term survival were also rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has a lower operative mortality and morbidity than a staged procedure. This primary resection with anastomosis is certainly as safe as an ileotransverse colostomy[ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%