2014
DOI: 10.17130/ijmeb.2014.10.23.683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocak Ayı Anomalisi: Borsa İstanbul Endeksleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Abstract: sermaye piyasalarında yatırımcılar için pay fiyatlarının tüm bilgiyi yansıttığını ve dolayısıyla farklı tekniklerle ortalamanın üzerinde bir getiri elde edilemeyeceğini ileri sürmektedir. Buna karşın, yapılan çalışmalar bu durumun tam tersi olarak sermaye piyasalarının rasyonel yatırımcılar tarafından yönetilmediğini ve pay getirilerinin zaman ile etkileşim içerisinde olduğu sonucunu ortaya koymuştur. Bu noktadan hareketle çalışmada, XUTUM, XU100, XU030, XUSIN, XGIDA, XTAST, XMESY, XUHIZ, XUMAL ve XHOLD endeks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the study are similar to the results of the studies by Çinko (2008), Atakan (2008), Patel (2016), Andrade, Chhaochharia and Fuerst (2013), Bouman and Jacobsen, (2002), Guo, Luo and Zhang (2014), Degenhardt and R. Auer (2018). Also different from the studies by Küçüksille (2012), Ege, Topaloğlu and Coşkun (2012), Yılancı (2013), Aytekin and Sakarya (2014). In this study, a significant January effect can not be mentioned.…”
Section: International Journal Of Economic and Administrative Studiescontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The results of the study are similar to the results of the studies by Çinko (2008), Atakan (2008), Patel (2016), Andrade, Chhaochharia and Fuerst (2013), Bouman and Jacobsen, (2002), Guo, Luo and Zhang (2014), Degenhardt and R. Auer (2018). Also different from the studies by Küçüksille (2012), Ege, Topaloğlu and Coşkun (2012), Yılancı (2013), Aytekin and Sakarya (2014). In this study, a significant January effect can not be mentioned.…”
Section: International Journal Of Economic and Administrative Studiescontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…January effect is validated for many markets such as Montreal and Toronto Stock Exchange (Berges et al, 1984), Amsterdam (Van Den Bergh & Wessels, 1985), Madrid Stock Exchange (Santesmases, 1986), Bruxelles, London, New York and Paris (Corhay et al, 1987), Philippines (Aggarwal & Tandon, 1994), Amman Stock Exchange (Alrabadi & Al-Qudah, 2012), Borsa İstanbul (Aytekin & Sakarya, 2014), United Kingdom, Singapur, U.S.A, Malaysia, Taiwan and Hong Kong Stock Exchange Markets (Ho, 1990). …”
Section: A Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies reveal that stock returns are higher in some months of the year than others. January is the month that stocks have higher returns and this anomaly is called the “January effect” (Aytekin and Sakarya, 2014; Karan and Uygur, 2001; Kato and Schallheim, 1985; Rozeff and Kinney, 1976; Thaler, 1987). These studies used the Gregorian calendar to investigate the January effect in the financial markets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the calendar anomalies, the “January effect” has been the subject of many studies. These studies suggest that January provides higher returns than the other months of the year (Aytekin and Sakarya, 2014; Karan and Uygur, 2001; Kato and Schallheim, 1985; Rozeff and Kinney, 1976; Thaler, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%