2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational cataracts and lens opacities in interventional cardiology (O'CLOC study): are X-Rays involved?

Abstract: BackgroundThe eye is well known to be sensitive to clearly high doses (>2 Gy) of ionizing radiation. In recent years, however, cataracts have been observed in populations exposed to lower doses. Interventional cardiologists are repeatedly and acutely exposed to scattered ionizing radiation (X-rays) during the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures they perform. These "low" exposures may cause damage to the lens of the eye and induce early cataracts, known as radiation-induced cataracts. The O'CLOC study (Occupa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Worgul et al [12], uncertainties on the estimated doses remain an important limit of the paper, even if the impact of dose uncertainty on the results was assessed. In medical staff studies, doses were either based on passive dosimetry (chest badge) [28] which may not be a good index for eye lens exposure, especially when radiation protection eyewear is used, or based on description of workload in terms of procedures and mean doses per procedure, which may suffer from memory bias [29][30][31]. However, radiation-induced cataracts have been globally observed in different exposed populations at lower doses (< 1 Gy) than the expected dose threshold of 2 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Worgul et al [12], uncertainties on the estimated doses remain an important limit of the paper, even if the impact of dose uncertainty on the results was assessed. In medical staff studies, doses were either based on passive dosimetry (chest badge) [28] which may not be a good index for eye lens exposure, especially when radiation protection eyewear is used, or based on description of workload in terms of procedures and mean doses per procedure, which may suffer from memory bias [29][30][31]. However, radiation-induced cataracts have been globally observed in different exposed populations at lower doses (< 1 Gy) than the expected dose threshold of 2 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In France, the multicenter cross-sectional O'CLOC study (Occupational Cataracts and Lens Opacities in interventional Cardiology) was performed between October 2009 and April 2011 [31]. 106 interventional cardiologists and 99 unexposed workers were included.…”
Section: Radiology Techniciansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W literaturze przedmiotu zwraca się uwagę, że w badaniach prowadzonych w Skandynawii i Francji stwierdzono korelację między występowaniem zaćmy a pracą związaną z narażeniem na promieniowanie jonizujące [28][29][30]. Badania amerykań-skie Doody et al dotyczące ryzyka wystąpienia raka piersi u kobiet zatrudnionych w placówkach, gdzie istnieje ryzyko narażenia na promieniowanie, wykazały, że rak piersi jest skorelowany z okresem zatrudnienia [31].…”
Section: Omówienieunclassified
“…The aim of the O'CLOC study was to analyse the risk of radiation-induced cataracts among ICs (Jacob et al, 2010). As part of this study, we developed a specific questionnaire to collect information about lifetime occupational activity, intended to obtain as complete and precise a picture as possible of the workload of ICs as well as their use of radiation protection equipment, including lead aprons, in particular, but also lead thyroid shields, lead eyewear and face shields, and ceilingsuspended shields in every centre where they had worked or were working.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before we began the O'CLOC epidemiological study (Occupational Cataracts and Lens Opacities in Interventional Cardiology) (Jacob et al, 2010), little was known about radiation protection among ICs in France. In this paper, we use a sample of French ICs from that study (Jacob et al, 2010) to describe selfreported use of individual dosimeter and radiation protection tools by these specialists, but also information of dosimetric monitoring registered in the SISERI (Système d'Information de la Surveillance de l'Exposition aux Rayonnement Ionisants, that is, an information system for monitoring exposure to ionising radiation) database, to obtain an overview of radiation protection as it was actually practised by ICs from 01/01/2005 to 31/12/2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%