2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational exposure parameters for characterization of nanoparticulate matter toxicity: Metal versus wood processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
22
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Particles from the metalworking industry comprised Fe > C > Si > Ca > Zn > Cr > Mn (in decreasing order), while particles from the wood processing industry comprised C > Si > Ca > Fe > Mo > Na. The predominant elements were carbon and oxygen, and there were also traces of chlorine and sulphur that possibly originated from organic compounds or from inorganic oxides, acids and salts (Pavlovska et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particles from the metalworking industry comprised Fe > C > Si > Ca > Zn > Cr > Mn (in decreasing order), while particles from the wood processing industry comprised C > Si > Ca > Fe > Mo > Na. The predominant elements were carbon and oxygen, and there were also traces of chlorine and sulphur that possibly originated from organic compounds or from inorganic oxides, acids and salts (Pavlovska et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of particle mass concentration, it is clear that exposure is very high in the range of inhalable particles. However, in the case of particle number concentration, it is very high in range of respirable, fine or ultrafine particles (Pavlovska et al 2016 ). Currently, total dust, inhalable and respirable dust mass concentrations are used to describe the whole impact to workers’ health, but there are many discussions on particle number concentration as a better parameter for the characterization of workers’ health effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airborne particulates from an 8 h work shift were collected from around the working zones close to the workers in two environments: the metalworking industry (M), to assess the processes related to welding (shielded metal arc welding) and milling, in which many particles are released in the nanoscale range (<100 nm), and the woodworking industry (W), where grinding and polishing processes were used to assess organic particles. The size, shape, quantity, and chemical compositions of nanoparticles were detailed in previous work on the occupational exposure parameters for the characterization of nanoparticulate matter toxicity and a comparison of the biological markers in aerosol-weighed workplaces [17,18,19]. These studies showed the presence of all three types of dust, microscopic, ultramicroscopic, and nanometric (< 100 nm, containing inorganic and organic dusts, as well as toxic elements like Zn, Si, Fe, Mn, and Cr).…”
Section: Collection and Measurement Of The Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the main inorganic elements constituting the particles were present, including sodium, calcium, silicon, iron, magnesium, manganese, zinc, and chromium, as well as chlorine, potassium, and sulphur. Dust particles comprise all size groups according to the dispersity: visible (> 10 μm), microscopic (0.25-10 μm), ultramicroscopic (< 0.25 μm), and nanometric (1-100 nm) dust (Pavlovska et al 2016). Particles from the metal industry samples contain more dust of ultramicroscopic and nanometric sizes and less dust of the microscopic size (both inorganic and organic) already on particles from stage 2.…”
Section: Dust Particle Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%