2022
DOI: 10.1080/23328940.2022.2030634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational heat strain in outdoor workers: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 236 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the coming decades, more women are expected to enter the world of male-dominated work; therefore, more studies should be directed toward identifying workplace strategies for achieving gender equity. In this light, the literature suggests that sex should be considered an important contributing factor capable of modifying the physiological heat strain experienced by workers [ 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Yet, the majority of relevant studies investigate the impact of occupational heat-stress, not cold exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the coming decades, more women are expected to enter the world of male-dominated work; therefore, more studies should be directed toward identifying workplace strategies for achieving gender equity. In this light, the literature suggests that sex should be considered an important contributing factor capable of modifying the physiological heat strain experienced by workers [ 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Yet, the majority of relevant studies investigate the impact of occupational heat-stress, not cold exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISO‐LRF was designed to prevent heat injury by implementing work‐rest cycles and is designed to avoid health risk; Lancet‐LRF is based on a statistical fitting on labor productivity measurements within observed workplaces (Kjellstrom et al., 2018; Sahu et al., 2013; Wyndham, 1969) and thus is less restrictive but also more likely to be associated with the adverse health impacts that are amply evidenced (Flouris et al., 2018; Romanello et al., 2021). An excellent discussion of the relative merits of these two different approaches is included within Ioannou et al., 2022 and we will not recapitulate it here. A comparison of labor capacities as a function of WBGT as predicted by both LRFs is demonstrated in Figure S2 in Supporting Information S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early detection and intervention are critical to improving HRI outcomes, as mortality can drop from 80% in those with delayed cooling to 0% when elevated CBT is detected and reduced to less than 40 °C within 30 min of symptom onset [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Football players, soccer players, long-distance runners, military servicemembers, outdoor and manual workers, and emergency responders are all frequently affected by HRI-related morbidity and mortality ( Figure 1 ) [ 2 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Despite the frequency and potentially fatal consequences of undetected HRI, coaches, trainers, officers, and employers currently rely on visible cues and subjective assessments of their athletes and employees for early detection, such as malaise, confusion, thirst, ataxia, or excessive sweating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%