Global demand for beef is projected to increase into the foreseeable future (Smith et al. 2018). Thus, affordable, efficient, humane, and low-environmental impact production systems must evolve to keep pace. Unfortunately, efforts to satisfy growing appetites for nutritious and inexpensive beef necessitate significant reallocation of natural resources and ultimately produce more wastes than can reasonably be accommodated in traditional fertilizer/crop cycles. Generation and release of greenhouse gases, odors, excessive nutrient loading, and depletion of available feedstock and water resources are but a few environmental consequences of increasingly industrialized animal protein production. However, the focus of this Point of Reference is limited to environmental dissemination and potential impacts of veterinary pharmaceuticals and pesticides used during the end stages of the modern beef production sequence. The proportion of cattle finished on industrial feeding operations or feedyards worldwide continues to grow (Smith et al. 2018). "Finishing" refers to a period of several months in which cattle are fed energy-dense diets to add muscle and fat prior to slaughter and is common practice throughout the United States, Canada, and Australia, with increasing prevalence in Mexico, China, Paraguay, Brazil, and Argentina. Emergence of commercial feedyard operations is made possible by improved cattle genetics but also use of veterinary pharmaceuticals and pesticides to 1) improve feed conversion efficiency, and 2) curb diseases, pests, and undesirable behaviors and physiological processes. Commercial feedyards could not operate profitably without synthetic anabolic steroids, beta-adrenergic agonists, pesticides, and antimicrobials. The animal production agriculture sector is the single greatest consumer of antimicrobials. In the United States,