“…Since then, there have been a number of reports detailing the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and genetic diversity among serotype 6C isolates collected from both invasive disease and nasopharyngeal colonization studies (Campos et al, 2009;Carvalho et al, 2009;du Plessis et al, 2008;Green et al, 2011;Hermans et al, 2008;Jacobs et al, 2008Jacobs et al, , 2009Nahm et al, 2009;Nunes et al, 2009;Rolo et al, 2011a;Tocheva et al, 2010). In studies that looked at the prevalence of serotype 6C among invasive and carriage isolates, it was found that anywhere between 5% and 100% of isolates that originally typed as 6A were subsequently identified as serotype 6C (Campos et al, 2009;Carvalho et al, 2009;du Plessis et al, 2008;Hermans et al, 2008;Jacobs et al, 2009;Millar et al, 2010;Rolo et al, 2011a). This large range was primarily due to the fact that the proportion of serotype 6C isolates increased over time, while the proportion of serotype 6A isolates decreased.…”