2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: A review and roadmap for research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

21
1,620
2
36

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,776 publications
(1,750 citation statements)
references
References 241 publications
21
1,620
2
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Although chlorination led to the decrease of UV254, the genotoxic potential increased by 8.7% for 5 mg/l chlorine dose and 15.2% for 10 mg/l chlorine dose, respectively. The existence of ammonia in the secondary effluent caused the formation of chloramines during chlorination, which may produce DBPs with toxicities far more potent than those currently regulated (Plewa et al, 2004;Choi and Valentine, 2002;Richardson et al, 2007). Further works are necessary to elucidate the reason for the increase of genetic toxicity.…”
Section: Genotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although chlorination led to the decrease of UV254, the genotoxic potential increased by 8.7% for 5 mg/l chlorine dose and 15.2% for 10 mg/l chlorine dose, respectively. The existence of ammonia in the secondary effluent caused the formation of chloramines during chlorination, which may produce DBPs with toxicities far more potent than those currently regulated (Plewa et al, 2004;Choi and Valentine, 2002;Richardson et al, 2007). Further works are necessary to elucidate the reason for the increase of genetic toxicity.…”
Section: Genotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formation of iodinated disinfection byproducts (I-DBPs) including iodine containing trihalomethanes (THMs) and iodinated acetic acids during disinfection of drinking water has recently caused wide attention because they exhibit greatly increased toxicological effects compared to their chlorinated and brominated analogues (Plewa et al, 2004;Cemeli et al, 2006;Richardson et al, 2007;Plewa et al, 2008;Richardson et al, 2008). Mammalian cell assay has shown that iodoacetic acid is 3 and 288 times more cytotoxic, and 2 and 47 times more genotoxic than bromoacetic acid and chloroacetic acid, respectively (Plewa et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently, the primary disinfectant is changed from chlorine to the so-called alternative 59 disinfectant, like ozone. In some cases, chlorine is used as a secondary disinfectant following primary treatment with an 60 alternative disinfectant, particularly for ozone and chlorine dioxide (Richardson et al 2007). Chlorine and chloramines 61 have also been used in conjunction with ozone for this purpose (Badawy et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%