2011
DOI: 10.5216/rpt.v40i3.15973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OCORRÊNCIA DE ANTICORPOS anti-Neospora caninum EM VACAS LACTANTES DO MUNICÍPIO DE ARAGUAÍNA, ESTADO DO TOCANTINS, BRASIL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that lower cut-offs may result in an increased number of false-positive samples. Although there are debates about the ideal cut-off for the diagnosis of anti- T. gondii positivity in cattle, the most commonly used threshold is 1:200, which is considered more reliable [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that lower cut-offs may result in an increased number of false-positive samples. Although there are debates about the ideal cut-off for the diagnosis of anti- T. gondii positivity in cattle, the most commonly used threshold is 1:200, which is considered more reliable [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted in different regions of Brazil to detect anti-N. caninum IgG antibodies in cattle, whose prevalence ranges from 9.1% to 97.2% (Hasegawa et al, 2004;Vianna et al, 2008;Andreotti et al, 2010;Amaral et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2017). In the Amazon region, N. caninum infection has been described in the states of Pará (Minervino et al, 2008;Silva et al, 2017), Rondônia (Aguiar et al, 2006;Boas et al, 2015) and Tocantins (Martins et al, 2011), with prevalence rates varying from 10.4% to 52%. However, there are no seroepidemiological studies of N. caninum infection in the state of Amazonas, so there is a gap in information about herd health and factors associated with infection in this region of the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%