Octospora conidiophora (Pyronemataceae) – a new species from South Africa and the first report of anamorph in bryophilous Pezizales

Abstract

Octosporaconidiophora is described as a new species, based on collections from South Africa. It is characterised by apothecia with a distinct margin, smooth or finely warted ellipsoid ascospores, stiff, thick-walled hyaline hairs, warted mycelial hyphae and growth on pleurocarpous mosses Trichosteleumperchlorosum and Sematophyllumbrachycarpum (Hypnales) on decaying wood in afromontane forests. It is the first species of bryophilous Pezizales in which an anamorph has been observed; it produces long, claviform, curved, hyaline and transversely septate conidia. Three other cryptic species of Octospora were detected using three molecular markers (LSU and SSU nrDNA and EF1α), but these could not be distinguished phenotypically. These are not described formally here and an informal species aggregate O.conidiophora agg. is established for them. The new species and finds of Lamprosporacampylopodis growing on Campylopuspyriformis and Neottiellaalbocincta on Atrichumandrogynum represent the first records of bryophilous Pezizales in South Africa.

Has taxonomic vandalism gone too far? A case study, the rise of the pay-to-publish model and the pitfalls of Morchella systematics

“…It is precisely because of such intrinsic limitations that a broader spectrum of analyses is necessary in the delimitation of species, expressed in multidisciplinary approaches broadly termed as "integrative," "multisource," or "polyphasic" taxonomy (Dayrat 2005;Will et al 2005;Stadler et al 2014). Rather than relying on a single tool or a single source of information, integrative taxonomical approaches utilize multisource data to reach taxonomic conclusions, complementing multilocus analyses with population genetics, morphological, developmental, and behavioral analyses, chemotaxonomy, cytology, and ultrastructural and reproductive studies, as well as analysis of distributional patterns, ecological niches, and host associations (Will et al 2005;Padial et al 2010;Schlick-Steiner et al 2010;Barrett and Freudenstein 2011;Stech et al 2013;Carstens et al 2013;Zervakis et al 2014;Zamora et al 2015;Wei et al 2016;Kuhnert et al 2017;Haelewaters et al 2018;Sochorová et al 2019;Liu et al 2020;Samarakoon et al 2020;Wittstein et al 2020;Zamora and Ekman 2020;Maharachchikumbura et al 2021). It is only by the use of such integrative approaches and carefully evaluating all lines of evidence that a number of closely related and insufficiently clarified lineages in Morchella, such as the M. angusticeps/M.…”

Integrative approaches for species delimitation in Ascomycota

“…Thus, there is debate among mycologists to define species in a biologically meaningful context. In recent years, integrative approaches have become more popular to delimit species in Ascomycota (Araújo et al 2018;Haelewaters et al 2018;Sochorová et al 2019). Furthermore, in some Ascomycota lineages phenotypic methods fail to resolve species boundaries; therefore, it is necessary to have other approaches (Skrede et al 2017;Boluda et al 2019).…”

Additions to the genus Chroogomphus (Boletales, Gomphidiaceae) from Pakistan

“…Many taxa of fungi have recently been described using an integrative approach, combining morphology, DNA data and ecology (e.g. Aime 2004;Singh et al 2015;Accioly et al 2019;Jumbam et al 2019;Sochorová et al 2019). This was also shown to be a useful approach in the delimitation of species within Chroogomphus (Scambler et al 2018).…”