2009
DOI: 10.1080/07418820802178063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of Guilt, Defiance, and Repentance: Evidence from the Texas Death Chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In effect, a transition from discourse related to the "body" of the terrorist (i.e., his or her historical, social, and political positioning) to one focused on intrapsychic and interpersonal emotional processes will best ensure alignment with Sherman's (2003) "emotionally intelligent" paradigm of justice (relatedly, see Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Rice, Dirks, & Exline, 2009). As such, attention should be drawn to the constellation of variables which relate to one's ascribed and temporal characteristics (of birth and of epoch, respectively) and how these structural characteristics interact with street level, ad-hoc emotives.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In effect, a transition from discourse related to the "body" of the terrorist (i.e., his or her historical, social, and political positioning) to one focused on intrapsychic and interpersonal emotional processes will best ensure alignment with Sherman's (2003) "emotionally intelligent" paradigm of justice (relatedly, see Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Rice, Dirks, & Exline, 2009). As such, attention should be drawn to the constellation of variables which relate to one's ascribed and temporal characteristics (of birth and of epoch, respectively) and how these structural characteristics interact with street level, ad-hoc emotives.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Like Eaton and Theuer [18], Rice, Dirks, and Exline also found no statistically significant difference between those who did and did not make final statements based on offender demographic or case characteristics ( [20], p. 307). The nearly 300 statements analyzed were more likely to contain conventional sentiments that suggest sensitivity to the concerns of victims (such as guilt and repentance) rather than expressions of innocence, pronouncements of capital punishment as unjust, or claims that the legal system is biased and unfair ( [20], p. 309).…”
Section: Last Words Today: What Prisoners Saymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Like Eaton and Theuer [18], Rice, Dirks, and Exline also found no statistically significant difference between those who did and did not make final statements based on offender demographic or case characteristics ( [20], p. 307). The nearly 300 statements analyzed were more likely to contain conventional sentiments that suggest sensitivity to the concerns of victims (such as guilt and repentance) rather than expressions of innocence, pronouncements of capital punishment as unjust, or claims that the legal system is biased and unfair ( [20], p. 309). As noted by the researchers, and by Eaton and Theuer [18], this finding is at odds with a great deal of reintegrative shaming research, which suggests that serious offenders develop of variety of barriers against feeling responsibility for their actions and go to considerable lengths to deny their guilt and find fault with the justice system, if not the entire world [21].…”
Section: Last Words Today: What Prisoners Saymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expressions of defiance are less common in this setting (Schuck and Ward 2008, Rice, Dirks & Exline 2009, Heflick 2005. What is interesting about these statements is their lack of defiance in most cases.…”
Section: Execution Ritual For Inmatesmentioning
confidence: 99%