2022
DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of rivers, law and justice in the Anthropocene

Abstract: Beginning in the 2010s, rivers have captured the legal imagination of judges, legislators and activists alike, as part of a rapidly growing phenomenon described by UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, David Boyd as ‘a legal revolution that could save the world’. Investigating river cases in jurisdictions as diverse as Aotearoa New Zealand, Colombia, India, the United States and Australia, and following Nicole Graham's suggestion that the non‐human world is constantly reconstituted within … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any waterscape or landscape is inevitably also a ‘lawscape’ for humans. In their paper, John Page and Alessandro Pelizzon (2024) explore the legal and ontological nature of water bodies, highlighting that the traditional legal distinction between natural and artificial persons is insufficient to capture the ecological and cultural nuances of the bio‐social and culturally pluralistic contemporary realities. Focusing on the examples of rivers from across the globe (Aotearoa New Zealand, Colombia, India, the United States and Australia), they show how spatial re‐imaginings intersect with the law and how this leads to viewing the river as an entity is emerging in jurisprudence with a potential for legal personhood.…”
Section: Studying With Watery Places: This Special Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any waterscape or landscape is inevitably also a ‘lawscape’ for humans. In their paper, John Page and Alessandro Pelizzon (2024) explore the legal and ontological nature of water bodies, highlighting that the traditional legal distinction between natural and artificial persons is insufficient to capture the ecological and cultural nuances of the bio‐social and culturally pluralistic contemporary realities. Focusing on the examples of rivers from across the globe (Aotearoa New Zealand, Colombia, India, the United States and Australia), they show how spatial re‐imaginings intersect with the law and how this leads to viewing the river as an entity is emerging in jurisprudence with a potential for legal personhood.…”
Section: Studying With Watery Places: This Special Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-24). For further information on the concept of subjectivity I suggest: Gordon (2018), Charpleix (2018) and Page & Pellizzon (2022).…”
Section: _______________________________ Shima Volume 17 Number 2 2023mentioning
confidence: 99%