Of scalar hierarchies and welfare redesign: child care in three Canadian cities

Abstract

Scalar theory has recently come under attack for its emphasis on hierarchy. Yet the notion of scalar hierarchies cannot be abandoned if we want to understand actually‐existing social relations and the governance structures in which they are enmeshed. The conception of hierarchy employed by political economists is also more complex than that suggested by the ‘Russian dolls’ metaphor. A multiplicity of diversely structured, overlapping interscalar hierarchies operate in and across diverse policy fields. While these arrangements clearly influence what happens at the local scale, sufficient room often exists for local actors to modify the effects. The complexity of scalar hierarchies is illustrated through an analysis of the governance of child care provision in Canada. Child care arrangements are becoming integral to social reproduction in post‐industrial economies, where women form an increasingly important part of the labour force. This paper focuses on child care in three of Canada's largest cities, each of which is subject to a distinct provincial regime through which federal contributions are filtered. Yet, as we shall see, these cities are more than ‘puppets on a string.’

Childhood and the politics of scale: descaling children's geographies?

“…Among the more persuasive is that, as an organising principle of actually existing political and economic systems, scale does have material impacts, albeit not totally constraining, and these bear scrutiny (Hoefle 2006;Mahon 2006). Secondly, 'scalar concepts are fundamental to the organization and presentation of human-geographical narrative' (Jonas 2006:399).…”

“Our Public Library”: Social reproduction and urban public space in Toronto

“…Childcare, ambulance service, policing, transit, employment assistance, and public health became the responsibility of municipal governments operating under restructured provincial frameworks. The new provincial frameworks required that the Metro Toronto government rework postwar welfare policies that had prioritized the socialization of costs and risk (Mahon, 2009). Social services were dramatically reshaped as the city struggled to absorb new costs, resulting in cuts and increased deficit spending (Kipfer & Keil, 2002).…”

Continuity and Change in Public Policy: Redistribution, Exclusion and State Rescaling in Turkey

“…In the Turkish case, the role played by national political parties in local government and politics have had a subversive effect on the translation of citizens' claims to local and national welfare policy schemes. While, as in the cases of Toronto and Vancouver (Mahon, 2005; 2006: 460–1; 2007), progressive alternatives to neoliberal‐minded national policy schemes could be put forward by locally formed social‐democratic alliances as a result of civil society activism, in the major metropolitan centers in Turkey municipalities played a more central role in the formation of such alternative agendas. The party affiliations of the mayor, her/his autonomy from party headquarters and the relative policy autonomy of municipalities from the central government (Scarpa, ) played a central obstructive or facilitating role in promoting such claims.…”