1998
DOI: 10.1017/s0008423900009616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of “Special Interest”: Interest, Identity and Feminist Constitutional Activism in Canada

Abstract: A number of theoretical propositions are advanced through a consideration of the shifting strategies of feminist organizations in Canada during three rounds of constitutional negotiations. First, interest-oriented formulations alone do not capture the intricacies of representation. Representation should be conceived more broadly in terms not just of interest, but also of identity. Second, there are multiple routes to representation that include intersecting forms of representation. Finally, “special interest” … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, their members and supporters are regularly mobilized to participate in noninstitutionalized political venues, such as demonstrations, mass marches, and letter‐writing campaigns 2 . In Canada, for example, feminist activists in the 1980s and 1990s helped transform constitutional politics from the “‘high’ politics” of political elites to one that involved average women (Dobrowolsky 1998, 740). Against this achievement, Alexandra Dobrowolsky argues that neither interest‐based nor identity‐based politics can sufficiently account for feminist constitutional activism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, their members and supporters are regularly mobilized to participate in noninstitutionalized political venues, such as demonstrations, mass marches, and letter‐writing campaigns 2 . In Canada, for example, feminist activists in the 1980s and 1990s helped transform constitutional politics from the “‘high’ politics” of political elites to one that involved average women (Dobrowolsky 1998, 740). Against this achievement, Alexandra Dobrowolsky argues that neither interest‐based nor identity‐based politics can sufficiently account for feminist constitutional activism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important point is less that French-and English-Canadian feminists drew different conclusions about the Accord but that there was no associational framework in which they could engage each other directly in the interest of finding common ground, as well as in rethinking their interests (see Dobrowolsky 1998). Instead, their opposition or support was funneled upward toward the state, effectively as dueling lobbies.…”
Section: The Degree Of Civil Society Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some feminist scholars claim women's movements expand democratic space (Dobrowolsky 1998). But by entering constitutional politics, organized women may also 'intensify conflicts over the division of powers' (Field and Rocher 2000: 45), especially if divisions of power assign culturally sensitive powers to regional governments.…”
Section: Alignment With Nationalist Governmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%