2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of the in vivo behavior of calcium phosphate cements and glasses as bone substitutes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The values observed at day 7 suggest that the mere presence of particles of these products filling the cavities already yields higher density values in relation to the natural process of bone regeneration, as reported by Välimäki et al 6 and Sanzana et al 7 This phenomenon demonstrates the important role that the biomaterials studied play as scaffolds for bone healing and new bone formation, since they are replaced with bone tissue over time, through a phenomenon known as osteotransduction 8 . At the same time, they promote faster bone regeneration due to their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties 3 , through which the biomaterials seemed to induce the process of bone repair and new bone formation earlier than in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The values observed at day 7 suggest that the mere presence of particles of these products filling the cavities already yields higher density values in relation to the natural process of bone regeneration, as reported by Välimäki et al 6 and Sanzana et al 7 This phenomenon demonstrates the important role that the biomaterials studied play as scaffolds for bone healing and new bone formation, since they are replaced with bone tissue over time, through a phenomenon known as osteotransduction 8 . At the same time, they promote faster bone regeneration due to their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties 3 , through which the biomaterials seemed to induce the process of bone repair and new bone formation earlier than in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Evidences of the direct contact of bone and a calcium orthophosphate cement without soft tissue interposition might be found in literature [365,366]. Different studies reported on both cement bioresorption and the progress of bone formation around calcium orthophosphate cements which in certain cases demonstrated both osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties [367]. However, there are studies in which the osteoinductive properties of calcium orthophosphate cements were not confirmed [368].…”
Section: Bioresorption and Replacement Of The Self-setting Formulatiomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, based on the authors' experience using other glass systems, a glass preform temperature _40 K lower than the onset furnace temper-ature should be expected. Basically, considering the drawing tem-peratures reported in Section 2.3, the temperature of the preform was _545 LC for TiPS 0 , 580 LC for TiPS 2.5 and 650 LC for TiPS 5 , which are below the respective T c of the glasses (552 LC, 640 LC and 687 LC [22]). As it is possible to observe in Fig.…”
Section: Glass Fibresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solubility of phosphate glasses and the possibility of producing them in bulk, powder, porous scaf-fold or flexible fibre forms make them suitable for the design of resorbable biomedical devices for both hard and soft tissue regen-eration [3]. These glasses have been studied for bone tissue regen-eration in powder and porous scaffold forms or in composite materials [4][5][6][7][8][9], for application in the hard-soft tissue interface such as the ligament-tendon/bone attachment defects [10][11][12]. In addition, resorbable and flexible phosphate glass fibres are attractive materials for soft tissue regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%