2012
DOI: 10.1557/opl.2012.184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OFET Sensors with Poly 3-hexylthiophene and Pentacene as Channel Materials for Ionizing Radiation

Abstract: Pentacene and poly 3-hexylthiophene (P3HT) are the most promising p-type organic semiconducting materials for fabrication of organic field effect transistors (OFETs). OFETs with aforesaid organic semiconducting materials have been demonstrated as total dose detectors for ionizing radiation, wherein the changes in the electrical characteristic parameters, such as, increase in the OFF current, increase in the ON current, change in the current ratio, shift in the threshold voltage, change in the subthreshold swin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polymers appear very attractive as active layers in OFETs due to inherent advantages such as low cost [1,2] and being lightweight [3,4], flexible, [5,6], biocompatible [7], scalable [8,9], and processable at relatively low temperatures [10]. They have also been demonstrated as the active layer for a variety of applications including sensors [11,12] and displays [13,14]. Yet, when compared to other classic semiconductor devices, polymer devices are plagued by low mobility, low output current, and a small on/off ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymers appear very attractive as active layers in OFETs due to inherent advantages such as low cost [1,2] and being lightweight [3,4], flexible, [5,6], biocompatible [7], scalable [8,9], and processable at relatively low temperatures [10]. They have also been demonstrated as the active layer for a variety of applications including sensors [11,12] and displays [13,14]. Yet, when compared to other classic semiconductor devices, polymer devices are plagued by low mobility, low output current, and a small on/off ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have demonstrated a propensity for being low cost 1,2 , lightweight 3,4 , flexible, 5,6 , biocompatible 7 , scalable 8,9 , and processable at low temperatures. 10 They have also been demonstrated as the active layer for a variety of applications including sensors 11,12 and displays. 13,14 Yet, when compared to other organics such as evaporated small molecule active layers, polymer devices are plagued by low mobility, output current, and onoff ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%