2017
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f3d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-axis Prompt X-Ray Transients from the Cocoon of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts

Abstract: We present the results of numerical simulations of the prompt emission of short-duration gamma-ray bursts. We consider emission from the relativistic jet, the mildly relativistic cocoon, and the non-relativistic shocked ambient material. We find that the cocoon material is confined between off-axis angles 15 θ 45 • and gives origin to X-ray transients with a duration of a few to ∼ 10 seconds, delayed by a few seconds from the time of the merger. We also discuss the distance at which such transients can be dete… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
162
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
11
162
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• [1], this observation suggests a detection of an off-axis gamma-ray burst emission or cocoon emission arising from an ultra-relativistic jet launched at the merger [28,29]. However, the production of such an ultra-relativistic jet in numerical-relativity simulations is beyond the scope of our paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…• [1], this observation suggests a detection of an off-axis gamma-ray burst emission or cocoon emission arising from an ultra-relativistic jet launched at the merger [28,29]. However, the production of such an ultra-relativistic jet in numerical-relativity simulations is beyond the scope of our paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In others studies, the adopted index differs (e.g. n = 2 in Gottlieb et al 2018b;Xie et al 2018;Lazzati et al 2017). For the velocity profile, the adopted maximum velocity vej in different studies varies.…”
Section: Numerical Relativity Simulations and The Dynamical Ejectamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the jet structure predicted by our model and the results of numerical simulations byLazzati et al (2017). The upper panel refers to the distribution of kinetic energy per unit solid angle, while the lower panel shows the average Lorentz factor diminished by one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%