1969
DOI: 10.1177/002199836900300322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-Axis Tensile Coupon Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been mentioned previously many times, e.g. [7], the off-axis test is not sensitive to the value of F12 used in interpreting the results by means of the standard Tsai-Wu quadratic polynomial of Equation (1). It can easily be shown by calculation that the insensitivity is much deeper than that, and applies to a1 in general beyond an off-axis angle of about 5 ° .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As has been mentioned previously many times, e.g. [7], the off-axis test is not sensitive to the value of F12 used in interpreting the results by means of the standard Tsai-Wu quadratic polynomial of Equation (1). It can easily be shown by calculation that the insensitivity is much deeper than that, and applies to a1 in general beyond an off-axis angle of about 5 ° .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The general failure stress quadratic formula given in Equation (1) can be inverted to give strains as the independent variables. While a1 is approximately zero in the present test specimens, this is not true of E1 due to the Poisson effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rail shear tests have a number of disadvantages: it is very hard to produce a pure shear over the test section, and the test fixture introduces large stress concentrations. Coupon tests of the [ t 45]S specimen also have problems due to the fact that a state of combined The fourth test method uses off-axis coupon specimens of unidirectional composite [1][2][3][4][5]. This method seems ideal: easy specimen fabrication, very simple data reduction, requiring no special equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%