2006
DOI: 10.1787/budget-v4-art6-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-budget and Tax Expenditures

Abstract: This paper reports the work that has been done by the OECD Secretariat on the project on off-budget and tax expenditures. The paper makes use of information that was provided at an expert meeting held in Paris in February 2004.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Social security funds and, to some extent, public health funds are considered the clearest example of EBFs to which the benefit principle of earmarking is applied, using the argument that the premiums (contributions) are paid by the social partners (employers and employed) and that the funds thus "belong to" these groups at least to the same degree as to the government. For the same reason, the social partners are often represented on the board of management of such funds (see Kraan, 2004), and generally there are separate laws for the management of these funds and their budget procedures. In some countries, for example the United Kingdom, this theory has become redundant since the social security funds, once independent, have become fully integrated with the budget and are financed on a pay-as-you-go basis by social security contributions.…”
Section: Box 2 Benefit Principle Of Taxation and Fiscal Earmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social security funds and, to some extent, public health funds are considered the clearest example of EBFs to which the benefit principle of earmarking is applied, using the argument that the premiums (contributions) are paid by the social partners (employers and employed) and that the funds thus "belong to" these groups at least to the same degree as to the government. For the same reason, the social partners are often represented on the board of management of such funds (see Kraan, 2004), and generally there are separate laws for the management of these funds and their budget procedures. In some countries, for example the United Kingdom, this theory has become redundant since the social security funds, once independent, have become fully integrated with the budget and are financed on a pay-as-you-go basis by social security contributions.…”
Section: Box 2 Benefit Principle Of Taxation and Fiscal Earmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uygulamada; vergi indirimi, muafiyeti, istisnaları, vergi kredisi, düşük vergi oranı ve vergi ertelemesinden oluşan vergi ayrıcalıklarına vergi harcamaları adı verilmektedir. Vergi harcaması kavramı konusunda hem teorik düzeyde (Stiglitz -Boskin, 1977;Kraan, 2004) hem uygulamada (OECD, 2010) tartışmalar bulunmaktadır. Tartışmalar çoğunlukla genel standart vergi yapısının tanımlaması konusunda olmaktadır.…”
Section: Vergi̇ Harcamasi Kavrami Ve Amaçlariunclassified
“…The IMF's Government Finance Statistics Manual published in 2001(GFSM 2001 provides a comprehensive conceptual and accounting framework for analyzing and evaluating fiscal policies, especially the performance of the general government sector, which includes EBFs. The GFSM 2001 distinguishes EBFs from the government's "legislative budget" (namely, the budget that is enacted by law) because of their differing sources of finance and the various types of public oversight of their operations. 1 According to the IMF's Manual on Fiscal Transparency various kinds of operations may be set up outside the annual appropriations process, and are thus referred to as extrabudgetary.…”
Section: Box 1 Conceptual Framework Of Ebfsmentioning
confidence: 99%