2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-7123-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-chip passivated-electrode, insulator-based dielectrophoresis (OπDEP)

Abstract: In this study, we report the first off-chip passivated-electrode, insulator-based dielectrophoresis microchip (OπDEP). This technique combines the sensitivity of electrode-based dielectrophoresis (eDEP) with the high-throughput and inexpensive device characteristics of insulator-based dielectrophoresis (iDEP). The device is composed of a permanent, reusable set of electrodes and a disposable, polymer microfluidic chip with microposts embedded in the microchannel. The device operates by capacitively coupling th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an advancement of our previously reported 2D iDEP and an alternative to our 3D iDEP device. 17,20 As demonstrated in our results, 3D structures generate stronger DEP forces in comparison to 2D microstructures in iDEP devices, and the passivated electrodes are reusable. The stronger electric field gradient generated is further supported by the theory presented earlier in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is an advancement of our previously reported 2D iDEP and an alternative to our 3D iDEP device. 17,20 As demonstrated in our results, 3D structures generate stronger DEP forces in comparison to 2D microstructures in iDEP devices, and the passivated electrodes are reusable. The stronger electric field gradient generated is further supported by the theory presented earlier in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is two orders of magnitude greater than the peak gradients using the exact same input signal in our previous iDEP devices which only varied in two dimensions. 20 To obtain an estimation of the Clausius-Massotti factor (f CM ), the electrical parameters of S. aureus bacteria and the surrounding DI water medium shown in Table I were used. 12 Using Eqs.…”
Section: A Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This translates to limited frequency ranges due to equipment restrictions and large electronics. Further limitations of the platform are discussed in Zellner et al [22]. In addition, as this study evaluated frequencies at 100 kHz intervals, the DEP profiles generated are only discrete values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Zellner et al fabricated contactless DEP device to separate cells and polystyrene beads using a glass substrate as the barrier. 22 The contactless DEP devices do not require metal electrodes, or the metal electrodes can be reused because they do not need to be bonded to PDMS in the device. Unfortunately, the contactless AC DEP devices require high voltage with high frequency in order to cross the insulating barrier and generate strong enough electric field gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%