1990
DOI: 10.1080/03067319008028312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-Line and On-Line Preconcentration Techniques for the Determination of Phenylureas in Freshwaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results reported in Table I and from the figures it is obvious that still better recoveries are obtained following preconcentrating with C-18 bonded silica material than when SDB is used. These results disagree with previous preconcentration studies using PRP-1, one of the most used polymeric-type materials in on-line SPE LC studies (5,6,8). This type of polymeric material is recommended for medium polar compounds; e.g., a breakthrough volume of 100 mL was obtained for deethylatrazine in on-line studies using PRP 1 (23).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the results reported in Table I and from the figures it is obvious that still better recoveries are obtained following preconcentrating with C-18 bonded silica material than when SDB is used. These results disagree with previous preconcentration studies using PRP-1, one of the most used polymeric-type materials in on-line SPE LC studies (5,6,8). This type of polymeric material is recommended for medium polar compounds; e.g., a breakthrough volume of 100 mL was obtained for deethylatrazine in on-line studies using PRP 1 (23).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The CH2CI2 extracts are combined and analyzed simultaneously. 6 Coelution problem resolved by calculating chlortoluron recovery at 245 nm where MCPA does not absorb.0 Recovery calculated together. extraction of the most acidic pesticides, e.g., bentazone and MCPA, sulfuric acid (pH 2) and 50 mL of dichloromethane were added to the water sample, which was shaken again and extracted, thus following a previously described method from our laboratory (28).…”
Section: Sample Preparation Estuarine Water Samples Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This easy to use and configure platform demonstrates the advantages of a flow system, such as the increase in the rate of mass transport that affects both the electrochemical and spectroscopic response, can be applied to various types of measurements, ranging from fundamental mechanistic studies to analytical measurements. Furthermore, by constructing a hyphenated system, for example, using Units ABC 1 and ABC 3 , a dual activation process followed by a UV–vis measurement could be envisioned, to sustain combined herbicide and pesticide studies. Long-term use of this platform also could involve HPLC detection, taking advantage of the built in mass transport assembly and the linear flow pattern, which are already within the required HPLC flow rates (0.2–1 mL min –1 ) . Furthermore, the ability to also perform ECL (Unit ABC 2 ) can increase the overall sensitivity of analytical detection. , Finally, the ability to carry out ECL opens several future avenues for the detection of biomolecules and advantages over conventional fluorescence methods include enhanced S/N, increased sensitivity, reduced self-quenching, and simplified equipment. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling of the electrochemical detector to a UV-diode array detector enhances the selectivity and reinforces the identification of compounds [12][13][14][15][16]. Owing to the excellent sensitivity of electrochemical detection by itself, liquid chromatography in combination with amperometric detection and photolysis was chosen for the determination of the four phenylurea herbicides chlorotoluron [3-(3-chloro-p-tolyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], fenuron [1,1-dimethyl-3-phenylurea], linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea] and neburon [1-butyl-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methylurea] in ground and drinking water, although this method still has the unjustified reputation of being difficult to handle and having limited stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%