2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-018-3791-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offline Arbitrated Quantum Blind Dual-Signature Protocol with Better Performance in Resisting Existential Forgery Attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main compared indexes include computational overhead of the signature and verification, with the increasing number of blockchain nodes, as shown in Figure 6a,b. The lattice-based multi-signature [16,17] are quantum blind dual-signature [31] methods are selected as typical samples for comparison.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main compared indexes include computational overhead of the signature and verification, with the increasing number of blockchain nodes, as shown in Figure 6a,b. The lattice-based multi-signature [16,17] are quantum blind dual-signature [31] methods are selected as typical samples for comparison.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main compared indexes include computational overhead of the signature and verification, with the increasing number of blockchain nodes, as shown in Figure 6a,b. The lattice-based multi-signature [16,17] are quantum blind dual-signature [31] methods are selected as typical samples for comparison. In the computer simulation of Figure 6, the quantum blind dual-signature [31] and our proposed quantum blind multi-signature scheme have advantages over the lattice-based multi-signature method [16,17] in both the signing stage and the verification stage.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations