2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offsetting dispossession? Terrestrial conservation offsets and First Nation treaty rights in Alberta, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many PES projects also require supportive policy frameworks within settler/non‐Indigenous jurisdictions, over which IPs may have very little, if any, influence (Greiber ). In the case of the Red River Cree Nation of Alberta, Canada, provincial regulators blocked the Nation's attempt to enter into a carbon sequestration agreement, effectively barring their ability to engage with a PES (Hackett ). This once again demonstrates that PES programs are embedded within the jurisdiction of settler colonial states, making IPs’ success in using PES programs to practice care for their LTR once again subject to the regulations, laws, and policies of colonizing governments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many PES projects also require supportive policy frameworks within settler/non‐Indigenous jurisdictions, over which IPs may have very little, if any, influence (Greiber ). In the case of the Red River Cree Nation of Alberta, Canada, provincial regulators blocked the Nation's attempt to enter into a carbon sequestration agreement, effectively barring their ability to engage with a PES (Hackett ). This once again demonstrates that PES programs are embedded within the jurisdiction of settler colonial states, making IPs’ success in using PES programs to practice care for their LTR once again subject to the regulations, laws, and policies of colonizing governments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the idea behind conservation offset programs is that 'the ecosystem disturbance and habitat loss associated with development projects should be mitigated through the conservation of substitute areas of similar, or ecologically equivalent, habitat elsewhere' (Hackett, 2015, p. 65). Hackett (2015) explains that these biodiversity or conservation offset programs have become a popular response to the impact of the extractives industry in Alberta, Canada. Currently, there is no governmental regulatory framework to require offset programs.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and Offset Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we examine the concept of 'cultural offsets' as described by Sheppard (2015) to help understand the use of industry funding of cultural and recreational programs in exchange for access to community land for oil and gas development. While there is much research that has critically examined the use of environmental offset programs by the extractives industry (Hackett, 2015), few researchers have considered the use of cultural offsets in this same way. We argue that this is a significant gap in the research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Hackett (2015Hackett ( , 2016 describes the 'direct twinning' of forest conservation and oil sands development in Alberta, Canada, where mining corporations fund land purchase for conservation NGOs outside the zone where environmental and social impacts are concentrated. So far, the impacts of neoliberal market-based discourse on financial flows in conservation have been limited (Dempsey and Suarez 2016).…”
Section: Market-based Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%