2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001gl014151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OH column abundance over Table Mountain Facility, California: Annual average 1997–2000

Abstract: The column abundance of OH over Table Mountain Facility, California, (TMF) has been measured regularly since July 1997 using the Fourier‐transform Ultraviolet Spectrometer. The annual average OH column observed for 1998–2000 is 10–20% larger than that observed by another group over Tokyo for 1992–1995; 30–65% smaller than that observed by other groups over Colorado and New Mexico for 1980–1996; and 15–30% smaller than calculated by photochemical models. The Tokyo annual average and model estimates are within t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1C, gray), with an uncertainty of ±3% (1σ). This OH variability agrees with that observed over the FPO (15), although the absolute values of X OH from the FPO and TMF, both in middle latitudes, have shown statistical differences of several tens of percentage points (27).…”
Section: Observational Evidencesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…1C, gray), with an uncertainty of ±3% (1σ). This OH variability agrees with that observed over the FPO (15), although the absolute values of X OH from the FPO and TMF, both in middle latitudes, have shown statistical differences of several tens of percentage points (27).…”
Section: Observational Evidencesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…An earlier study using TMF spectra also analyzed the Q 1 ð2Þ line at 32; 458:5918 cm −1 [2] with good agreement being observed with the P 1 ð1Þ results [30]. The other OH lines are weaker and have greater interference from solar lines, and until recently these have not been reliably retrieved with existing techniques.…”
Section: Multiple Absorption Line Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…10). The five lines chosen are the same used in [27], and the calculation of the uncertainty is similar to that described in [30]. One important difference between this calculation and that of [30] is that here the uncertainty is calculated relative to a second order polynomial fit to the diurnal OH profile, rather than relative to a separate linear fit to both the morning and afternoon OH column abundances.…”
Section: Use Of the "Nanowindow" And The Conjugate-gradient Fitmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations