2016
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1140576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older anti-TNF-αagents: why not group them for common indications in the EU?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The manual mentioned at the beginning 1 clearly stated that EE is most useful and appropriate when preceded by evidence of efficacy and/or effectiveness. Nevertheless, the literature is full of EEs [9][10][11] that are likely to add only: (1) further uncertainty when based on sophisticated long-term models populated by doubtful data; and (2) poor information when based on short-term 'decision trees' derived from heterogeneous and inconclusive clinical studies. In general, on the basis of clinical studies not adequately supported by rigorous methodology, EEs can only speculate on uncertainty and overemphasise economic results of uncertain pharmacological treatments.…”
Section: Efficacy/effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manual mentioned at the beginning 1 clearly stated that EE is most useful and appropriate when preceded by evidence of efficacy and/or effectiveness. Nevertheless, the literature is full of EEs [9][10][11] that are likely to add only: (1) further uncertainty when based on sophisticated long-term models populated by doubtful data; and (2) poor information when based on short-term 'decision trees' derived from heterogeneous and inconclusive clinical studies. In general, on the basis of clinical studies not adequately supported by rigorous methodology, EEs can only speculate on uncertainty and overemphasise economic results of uncertain pharmacological treatments.…”
Section: Efficacy/effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%