2010
DOI: 10.5042/jic.2010.0086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older People's Perceptions of Assistive Technology — An Exploratory Pan‐European Study

Abstract: This paper describes a study undertaken to explore how assistive technology in the form of a wrist‐worn device is perceived by older people for whom it has been devised.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Williams et al . () reported that 76% and 65% of respondents rated the localisation and emergency alarm applications respectively as ‘important’. Brownsell et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Williams et al . () reported that 76% and 65% of respondents rated the localisation and emergency alarm applications respectively as ‘important’. Brownsell et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams et al . () found that 63% of participants were either ‘very concerned’ or ‘slightly concerned’ about lack of privacy from 24‐hour monitoring services. A further 59% expressed concern about sending data to non‐medical staff for fear of crime and maleficence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seok & DaCosta, ). Only a few studies address the attitudes of older people or their experiences with technology in nursing homes (Harrefors et al ., ; Landau et al ., ), geriatric rehabilitation units (Skymne et al ., ), or at home (Mahmood et al ., ; Williams et al ., ; McCaig et al ., ; Gramstad et al ., ). These studies focused on the significance of functionality, confidence in personal knowledge and experience, independence, and trust and security in the care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we pursued our assumptions and further investigated these different attitudes in order to understand how they might be explained. Landau et al, 2010), geriatric rehabilitation units (Skymne et al, 2012), or at home (Mahmood et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2010;McCaig et al, 2012;Gramstad et al, 2013). These studies focused on the significance of functionality, confidence in personal knowledge and experience, independence, and trust and security in the care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of studies appear to concentrate either on specific technologies (Melander-Wikman et al 2008;Williams et al 2010;King and Workman 2006); issues of usability (McCreadie and Tinker 2005;Magnusson et al 2004;Eisma et al 2004;Demiris et al 2008); the impact of the digital divide on non-care ICT (Comyn et al 2006;Cullen et al 2009); and assistive devices within the home setting (Tinker et al 2004). Without considering broader micro-and macro-aspects of older-adult community care, it is not possible to understand the complexity involved in the construction of perceptions of, and preferences for, ICT technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%