2021
DOI: 10.1088/2632-2153/abedc8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olympus: a benchmarking framework for noisy optimization and experiment planning

Abstract: Research challenges encountered across science, engineering, and economics can frequently be formulated as optimization tasks. In chemistry and materials science, recent growth in laboratory digitization and automation has sparked interest in optimization-guided autonomous discovery and closed-loop experimentation. Experiment planning strategies based on off-the-shelf optimization algorithms can be employed in fully autonomous research platforms to achieve desired experimentation goals with the minimum number … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently two new approaches to chemical optimization were reported, Summit 133 and Olympus, 134 benchmarking frameworks offer a large set of optimization strategies together with virtual benchmarks, and an experimental planning toolkit. In contrast to the aforementioned software, these frameworks are fully open-sourced and due to their open interface, it is possible to plug in any given algorithm, and this could be universally adapted to any typical automation platform.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently two new approaches to chemical optimization were reported, Summit 133 and Olympus, 134 benchmarking frameworks offer a large set of optimization strategies together with virtual benchmarks, and an experimental planning toolkit. In contrast to the aforementioned software, these frameworks are fully open-sourced and due to their open interface, it is possible to plug in any given algorithm, and this could be universally adapted to any typical automation platform.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimization campaign thus typically proceeds by iteratively testing sets of parameters x, as defined via a design of experiment or as suggested by an experiment planning algorithm [25][26][27] . Common design of experiment approaches rely on random or systematic searches of parameter combinations.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we consider the calibration of an HPLC protocol, in which six controllable parameters (Figure 7a, section S.3) can be varied to maximize the peak area, i.e., the amount of drawn sample reaching the detector. 25,65 Imagine we ran 1386 experiments in which we tested combinations of these six parameters at random. The experiment with the largest peak area provides the best set of parameters found.…”
Section: Chemistry Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tools such as Paver (Bussieck et al, 2014), part of the COIN-OR initiative, can be used alongside CUTEst (or other tools) for this purpose. The packages Olympus (Häse et al, 2021) and Benchopt (BenchOpt 1.1.0, 2021) have been recently developed as benchmarking and analysis frameworks for optimization problems. Olympus is designed for experiment planning and provides analytic benchmark problems, experimental datasets, and emulated datasets, but could be adapted to be applied to any optimization (or data-fitting) problem.…”
Section: State Of the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%