2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2014.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omalizumab management beyond clinical trials: The added value of a network model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently a prospective real-life study involving six patients with severe atopic asthma provided similar results [54]. However, besides experimental settings and "off-label" indications, very few data are available concerning the impact of omalizumab on rhinitis and the other comorbidities in patients suffering from severe allergic asthma with perennial sensitizations [46]. Table 6 highlights how R-L studies provided a follow-up duration significantly longer than RCTs (18.29 vs 8.57 months), which certainly better reflects what happens in routine clinical practice, being asthma a chronic disease.…”
Section: Discordant and Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recently a prospective real-life study involving six patients with severe atopic asthma provided similar results [54]. However, besides experimental settings and "off-label" indications, very few data are available concerning the impact of omalizumab on rhinitis and the other comorbidities in patients suffering from severe allergic asthma with perennial sensitizations [46]. Table 6 highlights how R-L studies provided a follow-up duration significantly longer than RCTs (18.29 vs 8.57 months), which certainly better reflects what happens in routine clinical practice, being asthma a chronic disease.…”
Section: Discordant and Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, non-responders have also been described among patients matching all the EMA prescription criteria [17, 28], and the efficacy of omalizumab in non-atopic asthma is also supported by the literature [53]. Patient selection, particularly in the field of biological drugs for asthma, still represents a challenge [54, 55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However drop-out rates due to lack of efficacy and adverse events do not significantly differ between NEONet and published Real-life studies. The population sample was smaller in comparison with other real-life studies, however it is quite homogeneous, as the patients live in the same geographical area, and the centers share the same diagnostic work-up and patient selection criteria [17]. In the NEONet population, patient decision was the most common reason for dropping out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the American TENOR cohort study [10, 11], subsequently in Europe similar registries were also developed in Belgium [12], in Spain [13, 14] and also in Italy, though limited to the North–East territory or related to specific research studies [15–17]. Possibly the most well organized registry on refractory asthma has been create in the United Kingdom by the British Thoracic Society [18–22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%