2019
DOI: 10.22211/cejem/112268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Certain Method of Determining the Burning Rate of Gun Propellant

Abstract: Article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2), it was assumed that the term Y could be considered constant and it was approximated to one. This confirms the results obtained in recent research [14]. Then, the Equation 7 was simplified as following (Equation 9):…”
Section: Pressure Inside Closed Vesselsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2), it was assumed that the term Y could be considered constant and it was approximated to one. This confirms the results obtained in recent research [14]. Then, the Equation 7 was simplified as following (Equation 9):…”
Section: Pressure Inside Closed Vesselsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has been previously verified that the term Y can be considered equal to one, on the following examples: a 4/1 single-base propellant with cylindrical single-perforated grains and the JA-2 triple-base propellant with seven-perforated grains [14].…”
Section: Burning Ratementioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The components of the combustion products remain unchanged. 25 5. Heat losses during the combustion process are not considered.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%