1906
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/66.3.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Method of Determining the Absolute Dimensions of an Algol Variable Star

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another more plausible scenario to account for such a huge amplitude is that the variability we are detecting is the consequence of the O'Connell effect (O'Connell 1951;Milone 1968;Johnston et al 2019), whereby ellipsoidally-modulated binaries are frequently found to present uneven maxima in their light curves. It had previously been suggested that this could be the result of a so-called "periastron effect" in which the binaries are somewhat eccentric and experience an increased irradiation effect close to periastron (Roberts 1906), however it quickly became clear that in most cases the brighter maxima does not coincide with periastron (Dugan 1916), or that their orbits were essentially circular (O'Connell 1936), thus ruling out this hy-pothesis. It is now generally thought that the effect is likely due to a hot or cool spot (or spots) on one of the component stars, perhaps via accretion streams which would naturally lead to hot spots (Wilsey & Beaky 2009).…”
Section: Pg 1034+001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another more plausible scenario to account for such a huge amplitude is that the variability we are detecting is the consequence of the O'Connell effect (O'Connell 1951;Milone 1968;Johnston et al 2019), whereby ellipsoidally-modulated binaries are frequently found to present uneven maxima in their light curves. It had previously been suggested that this could be the result of a so-called "periastron effect" in which the binaries are somewhat eccentric and experience an increased irradiation effect close to periastron (Roberts 1906), however it quickly became clear that in most cases the brighter maxima does not coincide with periastron (Dugan 1916), or that their orbits were essentially circular (O'Connell 1936), thus ruling out this hy-pothesis. It is now generally thought that the effect is likely due to a hot or cool spot (or spots) on one of the component stars, perhaps via accretion streams which would naturally lead to hot spots (Wilsey & Beaky 2009).…”
Section: Pg 1034+001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the quadrature phases (f = 0.25, 0.75 for circular orbits), we see the stars side-by-side, so a difference in brightness implies that one hemisphere of a component emits a different amount of radiation than the other hemisphere. Roberts (1906) first discussed the O'Connell effect, where he attributed it to stars in an eccentric orbit becoming tidally distorted near periapsis. His theory did not explain the presence of the O'Connell effect in systems with circular orbits, however, and is no longer considered a likely cause of the O'Connell effect in most systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested to be caused by tidal effects and an increase in mutual radiation at periastron between stars moving in eccentric orbits (the so-called periastron effect in close eclipsing binaries) by Roberts (1906) long time ago. However, O'Connell (1951) pointed out that the effect had no connection with orbital eccentricity but caused by the circumstellar dust and gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%