2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2009.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Pd/InAlAs metamorphic high electron mobility transistor (MHEMT)-based hydrogen sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 lists a comparison between the studied EP Pt-gate HFET and other HFETs. As compared to other works [34][35][36][37][38][39]42,45], the studied EP Pt-gate HFET presents robust thermal stabilities and excellent hydrogen sensing performance. Notably, the significantly high rectification ratio R of the studied EP Pt-gate HFET demonstrates superior switching performance under hydrogen-contained ambiences.…”
Section: Rqep (Min)mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 lists a comparison between the studied EP Pt-gate HFET and other HFETs. As compared to other works [34][35][36][37][38][39]42,45], the studied EP Pt-gate HFET presents robust thermal stabilities and excellent hydrogen sensing performance. Notably, the significantly high rectification ratio R of the studied EP Pt-gate HFET demonstrates superior switching performance under hydrogen-contained ambiences.…”
Section: Rqep (Min)mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, the response time constant under a hydrogen concentration of 10,000 ppm H 2 /air is longer than that under a 1000 ppm H 2 /air gas. This might be attributed to the overshoot phenomenon [42]. The relatively longer response time is principally affected by the irregularly high transient response under the 10,000 H 2 /air ambience.…”
Section: Rqep (Min)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The transient response and recovery times are defined as the times needed to reach 70% values of the subtraction between the initial and final steady-state currents under a hydrogen-containing gas and air. 25 The corresponding transient response and recovery times of device A are 3 s and 20 s upon exposing to a 1000 ppm H 2 /air gas. Figure 5b presents the transient response curve of device B at 200 • C. The applied voltage is fixed at 0.5 V. When a 1000 ppm NH 3 /air gas is introduced and removed, the response curve rises up and falls down quickly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%